ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01306331

Study of Contraceptive Efficacy & Safety of Phexxi™ (Previously Known as Amphora) Gel Compared to Conceptrol Vaginal Gel

NCT01306331, Phase 3, Completed, Evofem Inc.; results first posted 2020-07-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Contraceptive Efficacy & Safety of Phexxi™ (Previously Known as Amphora) Gel Compared to Conceptrol Vaginal Gel. Trials, record NCT01306331. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01306331

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Contraceptive Efficacy & Safety of Phexxi™ (Previously Known as Amphora) Gel Compared to Conceptrol Vaginal Gel
NCT number
NCT01306331
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
3,389 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Evofem Inc.
Conditions
Contraception
Interventions
Conceptrol, Amphora
First posted
2011-03-01
Last updated
2022-07-12
Results first posted
2020-07-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage183 days
The primary endpoint was the evaluation of contraceptive efficacy over six months (183 days) of Amphora™ Gel use when compared to Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the six-month cumulative pregnancy percentage of women in the MITT population by treatment group
Secondary6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage for Subjects With Perfect Use183 days
Perfect use contraceptive efficacy over six months (183 days) of Amphora™ Gel use when compared to Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the six-month cumulative pregnancy percentage of women in the efficacy evaluable (EE) population by treatment group

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage183 days
mITT Population - ITT subjects whose diaries indicated they had at least one episode of coitus while using the assigned study product (also referred as Typical-Use), between 18 to 35 years of age (inclusive) at enrollment, had at least 1 cycle without any backup contraception or EC, and for whom there was at least one report of pregnancy status.
pregnancy percentageMEAN
SECONDARY6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage for Subjects With Perfect Use183 days
EE populations - a subset of the MITT population that includes only subjects with at least one EE cycle, where an EE cycle is a cycle where the diaries indicated they used the product correctly for every act of intercourse in the cycle.
pregnancy percentageMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy PercentageConceptrol10.095% Confidence Interval 8.1 to 11.9pregnancy percentage
6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy PercentageAmphora10.595% Confidence Interval 8.6 to 12.3pregnancy percentage
6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage for Subjects With Perfect UseConceptrol4.295% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 5.6pregnancy percentage
6-Month (183 Days) Cumulative Pregnancy Percentage for Subjects With Perfect UseAmphora4.195% Confidence Interval 2.7 to 5.4pregnancy percentage

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDConceptrol1,659
Overall StudySTARTEDAmphora1,665
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDConceptrol758
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAmphora788
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDConceptrol901
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAmphora877

Adverse events74

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsConceptrol1931,477
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsAmphora1401,458
otherVaginitis BacterialInfections and infestationsConceptrol1701,477
otherVaginitis BacterialInfections and infestationsAmphora1601,458
otherVulvovaginal MycoticInfections and infestationsConceptrol1681,477
otherVulvovaginal MycoticInfections and infestationsAmphora1561,458
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersConceptrol801,477
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAmphora961,458
otherVulvovaginal PruritusReproductive system and breast disordersConceptrol761,477
otherVulvovaginal PruritusReproductive system and breast disordersAmphora551,458

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityConceptrol01,477
Total, all-cause mortalityAmphora01,458
Total, other adverse eventsConceptrol8571,477
Total, other adverse eventsAmphora7931,458
Total, serious adverse eventsConceptrol191,477
Total, serious adverse eventsAmphora111,458

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Conceptrol vs Amphora: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Conceptrol vs Amphora: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01306331

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01306331/events?page=2