ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01331837-sae

Etanercept vs Tocilizumab: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Etanercept vs Tocilizumab: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01331837-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01331837-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2740.2520.296wilson
Risk in group 20.3110.2890.335wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0378-0.0698-0.00564newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8790.7870.981log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8330.7130.973log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Etanercept than on Tocilizumab26.514.3177from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1EtanerceptParticipants received 50 mg etanercept subcutaneously weekly until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.4221,542EG000
Group 2TocilizumabParticipants received 8 mg/kg tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks until switch to another RA therapy or up to 4.9 years.4791,538EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were collected throughout the entire course of the study.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Tocilizumab in Comparison to Etanercept in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
NCT number
NCT01331837
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
Etanercept, Tocilizumab
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2017-07-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01331837-sae