ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01649856-a8513638

Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary Analysis

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary Analysis. Trial comparisons, record NCT01649856-a8513638. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01649856-a8513638

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.06740.0390.114wilson
Risk in group 20.05560.0240.124wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0119-0.06180.0683newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.210.4413.34log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.230.4193.6log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Rituximab SC than on Rituximab IV84.3from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Rituximab SC
Participants with previously untreated, CD20-positive DLBCL received up to 8 cycles of rituximab in combination with CHOP. Treatment was given on Day 1 of each cycle, and the cycle length (14 or 21 days) was decided by the study center. For Cycle 1, rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion; subsequent doses were given as 1400 mg via SC injection. Tumor response was assessed after 4 cycles according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999), which are presented in Outcome Measure 1. The duration of CHOP therapy could be reduced from 8 to 6 cycles for those who achieved CR or CRu after 4 cycles, but all participants received a full 8 cycles of rituximab.
12178OG000
Group 2Rituximab IV
Participants with previously untreated, CD20-positive DLBCL received up to 8 cycles of rituximab in combination with CHOP. Treatment was given on Day 1 of each cycle, and the cycle length (14 or 21 days) was decided by the study center. For all cycles, rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion. Tumor response was assessed after 4 cycles according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999), which are presented in Outcome Measure 1. The duration of CHOP therapy could be reduced from 8 to 6 cycles for those who achieved CR or CRu after 4 cycles, but all participants received a full 8 cycles of rituximab.
590OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary Analysis
Description
Tumor response was assessed according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). Relapse was defined as a new lesion or increase by ≥50% in size of previously involved sites, or ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm, following an earlier assessment of CR or CRu. The number of participants who had experienced relapse or death prior to the clinical cut-off date (October 2014) was determined.
Time frame
Up to approximately 2 years (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle [maximum 8 cycles; each cycle was 14 or 21 days], every 3 months thereafter, and/or 4 weeks after early termination)
Population
ITT Population (Responder Subpopulation): All participants who achieved CR or CRu after 4 cycles.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Combination With CHOP Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT01649856
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
Interventions
CHOP, rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan], rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2016-02-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01649856-a8513638