ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01649856

A Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Combination With CHOP Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

NCT01649856, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-02-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Combination With CHOP Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT01649856. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01649856

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Combination With CHOP Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT01649856
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
572 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
Interventions
CHOP, rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan], rituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]
First posted
2012-07-25
Last updated
2017-10-11
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-000669-19
Results first posted
2016-02-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu)Up to approximately 4.25 years
Tumor response was assessed per criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). According to consensus recommendations, CR was defined as complete disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. CRu was defined as disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and absence of splenomegaly, with regression of lymph nodes by greater than (\>) 75 percent (%) but still \>1.5 centimeters (cm) in size, and indeterminate bone marrow assessment. The percentage of participants with either response at the end of induction (EOI) was determined with corresponding 95% Pearson-Clopper confidence interval (CI).
SecondaryCancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresAt Cycle 7 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)
The CTSQ is a validated 16-item questionnaire that measures three domains related to satisfaction with cancer therapy. These include expectations of therapy, feelings about side effects, and satisfaction with therapy. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants.
SecondaryRituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Domain ScoresAt Cycle 7 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)
The RASQ is a 20-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to the impact of treatment administration. These include physical impact, psychological impact, impact on activities of daily living (ADLs), convenience, and satisfaction. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants.
SecondaryMedian Duration of Rituximab Administration for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)Duration of rituximab administration was defined as the time from start to end of the SC injection or IV infusion. The median duration was reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants by Time Spent in the Infusion Chair/Bed for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)
Chair time was defined as the amount of time the participant occupied an infusion chair/bed for a single treatment cycle of rituximab + CHOP chemotherapy. Where the chair time was not documented for a given cycle, it was reported as "Missing".
SecondaryPercentage of Participants by Time Spent in the Hospital for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)
Hospital time was defined as the amount of time the participant was in the hospital for the course of one cycle of rituximab + CHOP chemotherapy. Where the hospital time was not documented for a given cycle, it was reported as "Missing".
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Event-Free Survival (EFS) EventUp to approximately 4.25 years
EFS events included disease progression, relapse, initiation of other anti-lymphoma therapy, or death. Tumor response was assessed according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). Progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 50% increase in the sum of products of greatest diameters of any previously identified abnormal lymph node or the appearance of any new lesion. Relapse was defined as a new lesion or increase by ≥50% in size of previously involved sites, or ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm, following an earlier assessment of CR or CRu.
SecondaryDuration of EFSUp to approximately 4.25 years
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of disease progression, relapse, initiation of other anti-lymphoma therapy, or death, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). Progression was defined as a ≥50% increase in the sum of products of greatest diameters of any previously identified abnormal lymph node or the appearance of any new lesion. Relapse was defined as a new lesion or increase by ≥50% in size of previously involved sites, or ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm, following an earlier assessment of CR or CRu.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary AnalysisUp to approximately 2 years (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle [maximum 8 cycles; each cycle was 14 or 21 days], every 3 months thereafter, and/or 4 weeks after early termination)
Tumor response was assessed according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). Relapse was defined as a new lesion or increase by ≥50% in size of previously involved sites, or ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm, following an earlier assessment of CR or CRu. The number of participants who had experienced relapse or death prior to the clinical cut-off date (October 2014) was determined.
SecondaryDuration of Disease-Free Survival (DFS)Up to approximately 4.25 years
DFS was defined as the time from date of initial CR/CRu to the date of relapse or death from any cause. Tumor response was assessed according to criteria published by Cheson et al (1999). Relapse was defined as a new lesion or increase by ≥50% in size of previously involved sites, or ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm, following an earlier assessment of CR or CRu.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu)Up to approximately 4.25 yearsIntent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All participants who completed Baseline and at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresAt Cycle 7 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)ITT Population (CTSQ Subpopulation): All participants who completed the CTSQ at Cycles 3 and 7; number (n) = number of participants in the analysis for the specified domain.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYRituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Domain ScoresAt Cycle 7 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)ITT Population (RASQ Subpopulation): All participants who completed the RASQ at Cycles 3 and 7; n = number of participants in the analysis for the specified domain.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMedian Duration of Rituximab Administration for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)Safety Population; n = number of participants in the analysis for the specified timepoint.hoursMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants by Time Spent in the Infusion Chair/Bed for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)Safety Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants by Time Spent in the Hospital for Each Treatment CycleCycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (each cycle was 14 or 21 days)Safety Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With an Event-Free Survival (EFS) EventUp to approximately 4.25 yearsITT Population.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of EFSUp to approximately 4.25 yearsITT Population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary AnalysisUp to approximately 2 years (assessed at Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle [maximum 8 cycles; each cycle was 14 or 21 days], every 3 months thereafter, and/or 4 weeks after early termination)ITT Population (Responder Subpopulation): All participants who achieved CR or CRu after 4 cycles.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Disease-Free Survival (DFS)Up to approximately 4.25 yearsITT Population (Responder Subpopulation).monthsMEDIAN

Results by group276

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu)Rituximab SC50.695% Confidence Interval 45.2 to 56.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu)Rituximab IV42.495% Confidence Interval 35.0 to 50.0percentage of participants
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab SCExpectations of Therapy (n=280,141)79.35Standard Deviation 17.422units on a scale
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab IVExpectations of Therapy (n=280,141)82.94Standard Deviation 16.536units on a scale
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab SCFeelings about Side Effects (n=276,141)60.69Standard Deviation 21.594units on a scale
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab IVFeelings about Side Effects (n=276,141)57.62Standard Deviation 23.339units on a scale
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab SCSatisfaction with Therapy (n=278,141)85.92Standard Deviation 11.428units on a scale
Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Domain ScoresRituximab IVSatisfaction with Therapy (n=278,141)83.60Standard Deviation 13.451units on a scale
Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Domain ScoresRituximab SCPhysical Impact (n=278,140)86.24Standard Deviation 14.012units on a scale
Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Domain ScoresRituximab IVPhysical Impact (n=278,140)81.49Standard Deviation 16.848units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab Subcutaneous (SC)369
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab Intravenous (IV)203
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab Subcutaneous (SC)230
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab Intravenous (IV)125
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab Subcutaneous (SC)139
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab Intravenous (IV)78

Adverse events404

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab SC104369
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab IV54203
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab SC88369
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab IV40203
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab SC79369
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab IV47203
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRituximab SC56369
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRituximab IV34203
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab SC52369
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab IV20203

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab SC
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab IV
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab SC319369
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab IV172203
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab SC155369
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab IV77203

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28935843DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of Participants With an Event-Free Survival (EFS) EventTrial comparisons
Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of Participants With Progression, Relapse, or DeathTrial comparisons
Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of Participants With Relapse or Death at the Time of Primary AnalysisTrial comparisons
Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: Number of DeathsTrial comparisons
Rituximab SC vs Rituximab IV: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01649856

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01649856/results?page=2