ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01876368-e084c2f3

LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control. Trial comparisons, record NCT01876368-e084c2f3. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01876368-e084c2f3

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4470.3780.518wilson
Risk in group 20.310.2480.38wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1370.03850.231newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.441.11.88log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.81.182.74log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on LCZ696 200 mg than on Olmesartan 20 mg7.324.3326from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1LCZ696 200 mgPatients will be treated with one LCZ696 200 mg tablet and one placebo of olmesartan 20 mg capsule once daily for 8 weeks.84188OG000
Group 2Olmesartan 20 mgPatients will be treated with one placebo of LCZ696 200 mg tablet and one olmesartan 20 mg capsule once daily for 8 weeks.58187OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control
Description
Successful mean sitting systolic blood pressure control is defined as msSBP \<140 mmHg
Time frame
8 weeks
Population
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan in Essential Hypertensive Patients Not Responsive to Olmesartan
NCT number
NCT01876368
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
LCZ696, Olmesartan, Placebo of LCZ696, Placebo of Olmesartan
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2015-12-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01876368-e084c2f3