ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01876368

Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan in Essential Hypertensive Patients Not Responsive to Olmesartan

NCT01876368, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2015-12-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan in Essential Hypertensive Patients Not Responsive to Olmesartan. Trials, record NCT01876368. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01876368

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan in Essential Hypertensive Patients Not Responsive to Olmesartan
NCT number
NCT01876368
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
376 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
LCZ696, Olmesartan, Placebo of LCZ696, Placebo of Olmesartan
First posted
2013-06-12
Last updated
2015-12-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-001783-36
Results first posted
2015-12-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty-four hour mean ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) will be performed at baseline and at end of study (week 8). The first 24-hour ABPM will be performed beginning at 24 hours prior to baseline visit and the second will be performed 24 hours prior to week 8 visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Twenty-four hour mean ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) will be performed at baseline and at end of study (week 8). The 24-hour ABPM measurements are performed beginning 24 hours prior to baseline and week 8 visits.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Sitting blood pressure (BP) measurement will be taken at every visit from screening through end of study. For each participant at each visit, four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained (with a full two minute interval between measurements) and averaged to obtain the mean
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Sitting blood pressure (BP) measurement will be taken at every visit from screening through end of study. For each participant at each visit, four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained (with a full two minute interval between measurements) and averaged to obtain the mean
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressurebaseline, 8 weeksMean sitting pulse pressure (msPP) will be calculated at screening through end of study at every visit. Mean sitting pulse pressure is calculated as msSBP-msDBP.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Overall Blood Pressure Control8 weeksSuccessful overall blood pressure control is defined as both msSBP/msDBP \<140/90 mmHg
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control8 weeksSuccessful mean sitting systolic blood pressure control is defined as msSBP \<140 mmHg
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Control8 weeksSuccessful mean sitting diastolic blood pressure control is defined as msDBP \<90 mmHg
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Responsebaseline, 8 weeksSuccessful mean sitting systolic blood pressure response is defined as msSBP \<140 mmHg or a reduction ≥ 20 mmHg from baseline.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Responsebaseline, 8 weeksSuccessful mean sitting diastolic blood pressure response is defined as msDBP \<90 mmHg or a reduction ≥10 mmHg from baseline.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)baseline, 8 weeksA subset of randomized participants, who had ABPM measurements at both baseline and week 8, were included in the analysismmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)baseline, 8 weeksA subset of randomized participants, who had ABPM measurements at both baseline and week 8, were included in the analysis.mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)baseline, 8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressurebaseline, 8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Overall Blood Pressure Control8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Control8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Responsebaseline, 8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Responsebaseline, 8 weeks
Full Analysis Set (FAS) - All patients who were randomized. Following the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the randomization. However, patients who were not qualified for randomization and were inadvertently randomized into the study were excluded from the FAS
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)LCZ696 200 mg-4.26Standard Error 0.60mmHg
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)Olmesartan 20 mg-1.04Standard Error 0.61mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)LCZ696 200 mg-2.27Standard Error 0.39mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)Olmesartan 20 mg-0.35Standard Error 0.39mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)LCZ696 200 mg-14.21Standard Error 1.28mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)Olmesartan 20 mg-10.03Standard Error 1.29mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)LCZ696 200 mg-7.52Standard Error 0.70mmHg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)Olmesartan 20 mg-4.47Standard Error 0.71mmHg
Change From Baseline in Office Pulse PressureLCZ696 200 mg-6.67Standard Error 0.94mmHg
Change From Baseline in Office Pulse PressureOlmesartan 20 mg-5.54Standard Error 0.94mmHg

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLCZ696 200 mg188
Overall StudySTARTEDOlmesartan 20 mg188
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)LCZ696 200 mg188
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Olmesartan 20 mg187
Overall StudySafety Set (SAF)LCZ696 200 mg188
Overall StudySafety Set (SAF)Olmesartan 20 mg187
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCZ696 200 mg179
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOlmesartan 20 mg175
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLCZ696 200 mg9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOlmesartan 20 mg13

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDIZZINESSNervous system disordersLCZ696 200 mg2188
otherDIZZINESSNervous system disordersOlmesartan 20 mg4187
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersLCZ696 200 mg5188
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersOlmesartan 20 mg6187
seriousBENIGN NEOPLASM OF THYROID GLANDNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)LCZ696 200 mg0188
seriousBENIGN NEOPLASM OF THYROID GLANDNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Olmesartan 20 mg1187
seriousCEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENTNervous system disordersLCZ696 200 mg0188
seriousCEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENTNervous system disordersOlmesartan 20 mg1187

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLCZ696 200 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityOlmesartan 20 mg
Total, other adverse eventsLCZ696 200 mg7188
Total, other adverse eventsOlmesartan 20 mg10187
Total, serious adverse eventsLCZ696 200 mg0188
Total, serious adverse eventsOlmesartan 20 mg2187

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) ControlTrial comparisons
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) ResponseTrial comparisons
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) ControlTrial comparisons
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) ResponseTrial comparisons
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: Number of Patients Achieving Successful Overall Blood Pressure ControlTrial comparisons
LCZ696 200 mg vs Olmesartan 20 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01876368

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01876368/results?page=2