ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02144077-sae

BF-200 ALA vs Methyl-aminolevulinate: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. BF-200 ALA vs Methyl-aminolevulinate: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02144077-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02144077-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02170.007420.062wilson
Risk in group 20.0490.02390.0976wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0272-0.07790.0202newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.4440.1171.68log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.4320.1091.7log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on BF-200 ALA than on Methyl-aminolevulinate36.7from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1BF-200 ALA
Topical application of BF-200 ALA gel (78 mg/g 5-aminolevulinic acid). The dose of BF-200 ALA was up to 1 g per PDT session (depending on size and number of target lesions located on neck, trunk, extremities, face or scalp, no more than 2 illumination areas with a maximum area incl. margin of 10cm², and a film thickness of about 1mm). Up to 4 administrations of study treatment (i.e. PDT sessions: drug application and subsequent illumination with BF-RhodoLED after 3h of drug incubation) were applied. For all patients, PDT-1 was to be administered directly after randomization and PDT-2 was to be administered approximately 1 week later. The total number of PDT sessions per patient depended on response as follows: Complete responders (lesions totally cleared clinically) 12 weeks after PDT-2: entered the FU part with no further treatment. Partial or non-responders 12 weeks after PDT-2 were retreated with by applying 2 additional PDTs in a second PDT cycle and then entered FU.
3138EG000
Group 2Methyl-aminolevulinate
Topical application of methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL;160 mg/g). The dose of MAL was up to 1 g per PDT session (depending on size and number of target lesions located on neck, trunk, extremities, face or scalp, no more than 2 illumination areas with a maximum area incl. margin of 10cm², and a film thickness of about 1mm). Up to 4 administrations of study treatment (i.e. PDT sessions: drug application and subsequent illumination with BF-RhodoLED after 3h of drug incubation) were applied. For all patients, PDT-1 was to be administered directly after randomization and PDT-2 was to be administered approximately 1 week later. The total number of PDT sessions per patient depended on response as follows: Complete responders (lesions totally cleared clinically) 12 weeks after PDT-2: entered the FU part with no further treatment. Partial or non-responders 12 weeks after PDT-2 were retreated by applying 2 additional PDTs in a second PDT cycle and then entered FU.
7143EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Each subject was assessed for a maximum of approximately 6 months after randomization depending on whether they received a second PDT cycle or not. Complete responders after the first PDT cycle were assessed for approximately 3 months after randomization. Additionally, there was a pre-randomization period of max. 2 weeks per patient.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study for the Treatment of Non-Aggressive Basal Cell Carcinoma With Photodynamic Therapy
NCT number
NCT02144077
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
Interventions
BF-200 ALA, methyl-aminolevulinate
Lead sponsor
Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH
Results first posted
2019-03-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02144077-sae