ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02241655-sae

EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02241655-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02241655-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2020.1720.236wilson
Risk in group 20.210.180.244wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0084-0.05360.0368newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.960.7711.2log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.950.7211.25log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on EEG Guided Protocol than on Control Arm119from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1EEG Guided Protocol
Participants will have a pragmatic EEG-guided anesthetic protocol during their surgery. Practitioners will modify administration of anesthesia in an attempt to limit the occurrence of EEG burst suppression or persistent suppression.~a pragmatic EEG-guided anesthetic protocol
124614EG000
Group 2Control ArmParticipants will have the standard anesthetic protocol.130618EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were collected during surgery up to 30 days postoperatively

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia
NCT number
NCT02241655
Phases
NA
Conditions
Delirium
Interventions
a pragmatic EEG-guided anesthetic protocol
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Results first posted
2019-06-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02241655-sae