ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02241655

Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia

NCT02241655, Not applicable, Completed, Washington University School of Medicine; results first posted 2019-06-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia. Trials, record NCT02241655. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02241655

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia
NCT number
NCT02241655
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
1,400 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Conditions
Delirium
Interventions
a pragmatic EEG-guided anesthetic protocol
First posted
2014-09-16
Last updated
2026-10-29
Results first posted
2019-06-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Delirium5 days
Delirium will be assessed at baseline and then once a day postoperative for up to 5 days. Patients were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for verbal patients or the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit for non verbal or intubated patients, and patients medical records were reviewed for evidence of delirium by doctors and nurses assessments. Patients were considered to have delirium by any modality at anytime postoperative day one through five.
SecondaryThe Number of Participants With Postoperative FallsUp to 1 year postoperatively
The hypothesis is that the EEG-guided anesthetic protocol and providing a safety intervention will prevent subsequent injurious falls. Falls will be assessed using the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) questions. At baseline questions will be asked about preoperative falls, and at 30-days and 1-year postoperatively, questions will be asked about postoperative falls.
SecondaryHealth Related Quality of LifeUp to one year postoperatively
The hypothesis is that the EEG-guided anesthetic protocol will improve postoperative quality of life. Patient self-reported Health-related Quality of Life information will be assessed through the Veteran's RAND 12-item Health Survey at baseline and during follow-up (30-day and 1-year). The 12-item survey results in two summary scores called the Physical Composite Summary and the Mental Composite Summary. Each of these summary scores takes values between 0 and 100, where higher values represent better quality of life.
OtherDuration of Delirium5 daysDuration will be calculated by the number of positive CAM,CAM-ICU or delirium chart reviews.
Other
Agreements Between the Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM), and Researchers' Delirium Assessments and Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) or Delirium Chart Reviews
3 days
Families of some patients in the ENGAGES trial and "The Prevention of Delirium and Complications Associated with Surgical Treatments" study (NCT01690988) completed FAM-CAM assessments in the afternoon. The FAM-CAM results in a binary classification of presence/absence of delirium. All time points between postoperative day 1-3 with concurrent family-completed FAM-CAM assessments and researcher-completed CAM/CAM-ICU assessments were included. Both arms of both trials were included together to minimize the risk of sampling bias due to a low rate of the FAM-CAM surveys returned. Delirium incidence using each assessment tool was quantified. Agreement between the concurrent FAM-CAM assessments and CAM/CAM-ICU assessments was quantified using repeated measures Cohen's kappa.
OtherIncidence of Post-discharge DeliriumPostoperative day 30Defined as a positive FAM-CAM assessment between hospital discharge and postoperative day 30
OtherMaximum Postoperative Pain (Patient Reported and Observational)5 days
Pain was measured daily from postoperative day 1-5 using both patient-report and observational modalities. Patient-reported pain at rest was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), with possible scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating worse pain. The maximum VAS score between postoperative days 1-5 is reported here. Observational pain was assessed using the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) for intubated patients or the Behavioral Pain Scale - Non-Intubated (BPS-NI) for non-intubated patients. BPS and BPS-NI scores range from 3 to 12, with higher scores indicating worse pain. The maximum BPS or BPS-NI score between postoperative days 1-5 is reported here.
OtherPostoperative Actigraphy1 day
Postoperative disturbances in sleep abnormalities have previously been associated with postoperative delirium. Measures of root mean-squared activity (RMSactivity) was calculated by combining counts (binned in 1-minute intervals) across all three accelerometer axes (X, Y, and Z) from 16:00 on the day of surgery to 6:00 the following day. Median activity count was calculated from all minutes with nonzero RMS activity within each epoch- higher values indicate more movement.
OtherRelationship Between Clinical CAM-ICU and Rigorous Delirium Assessments5 days
Routine clinical (i.e. conducted by ICU nursing staff) delirium assessments in the intensive care units (conducted with the CAM-ICU) will be collected when these are available. Comparison will be made on the outcome of the assessment (positive for delirium or negative by delirium) between these routine clinical assessments and the assessments made by the research team. Since the purpose of this is to determine whether clinical staff are picking up episodes of delirium compared to researcher's assessment in all patients regardless of treatment group, data from both treatment arms were combined for the analysis.
OtherOne-year All-cause Mortality1 yearDeath from any cause within one year

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Delirium5 days
A total of 1232 patients were randomized (614 EEG guided protocol and 618 control arm). In the EEG guided group 10 patients could not be assessed for delirium (6 comatose, 2 withdrew, 2 early hospital discharge). In the control arm 9 patients could not be assessed for delirium (1 died, 5 comatose, 1 withdrew, 2 early hospital discharge).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPostoperative FallsUp to 1 year postoperatively
SECONDARYHealth Related Quality of LifeUp to one year postoperatively
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDDuration of Delirium5 days
A total of 1232 patients were randomized (614 EEG guided protocol and 618 control arm). In the EEG guided group 10 patients could not be assessed for delirium (6 comatose, 2 withdrew, 2 early hospital discharge). In the control arm 9 patients could not be assessed for delirium (1 died, 5 comatose, 1 withdrew, 2 early hospital discharge).
daysMEDIAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDAgreements Among the FAM-CAM, Researchers' Delirium Assessments and Patient Perceptions5 days
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDDuration or Recurrence of Delirium After Hospital Discharge30 days post discharge
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDClinically Relevant Outcomes Associated With Delirium1 year
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDComparison of Patient-reported and Observational Pain Scores5 days
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPostoperative Actigraphy1 day
A total of 84 patients had analyzable data and included in the analysis. Patients were pooled regardless of intervention (EEG guidance or usual care) since the primary outcome was to assess whether using actigraphy could predict delirium regardless of interventions. Therefore, patients were separated by delirious and non-delirious patients.
minutes RMSactivity>0MEDIAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRelationship Between Clinical CAM-ICU and Rigorous Delirium Assessments5 days
Patients who were in the ICU, had a nursing CAM-ICU assessment and researcher's delirium assessment were included in this analysis. Agreement between the instruments was calculated using Kappa agreement.
Cohen's kappa coefficientNUMBER

Results by group33

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With DeliriumEEG Guided Protocol157Participants
Number of Participants With DeliriumControl Arm140Participants
Duration of DeliriumEEG Guided Protocol1Inter-Quartile Range 1 to 3days
Duration of DeliriumControl Arm1Inter-Quartile Range 1 to 3days
Postoperative ActigraphyNo Delirium134Inter-Quartile Range 59 to 195minutes RMSactivity>0
Postoperative ActigraphyDelirium POD 0-1101Inter-Quartile Range 50 to 141minutes RMSactivity>0
Postoperative ActigraphyDelirium POD 2-593Inter-Quartile Range 36 to 236minutes RMSactivity>0
Relationship Between Clinical CAM-ICU and Rigorous Delirium AssessmentsPatients With Nursing ICU Assessment0.3795% Confidence Interval 0.29 to 0.44Cohen's kappa coefficient
Delirium Prediction ModelsRegression AnalysisGuided Group1.1295% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 1.64odds ratio
Delirium Prediction ModelsRegression AnalysisAge1.0495% Confidence Interval 1.02 to 1.06odds ratio

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEEG Guided Protocol614
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Arm618
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEEG Guided Protocol614
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Arm618
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEEG Guided Protocol0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Arm0

Adverse events180

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBleeding/anemia requiring unexpected transfusionBlood and lymphatic system disordersEEG Guided Protocol121614
otherBleeding/anemia requiring unexpected transfusionBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Arm126618
otherEmbolusBlood and lymphatic system disordersEEG Guided Protocol0614
otherEmbolusBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Arm1618
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEEG Guided Protocol24614
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Arm23618
otherThrombosis without embolusBlood and lymphatic system disordersEEG Guided Protocol15614
otherThrombosis without embolusBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Arm12618
otherOther hematologic eventBlood and lymphatic system disordersEEG Guided Protocol2614
otherOther hematologic eventBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Arm1618

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEEG Guided Protocol4614
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Arm20618
Total, other adverse eventsEEG Guided Protocol361614
Total, other adverse eventsControl Arm345618
Total, serious adverse eventsEEG Guided Protocol124614
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Arm130618

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27311914DERIVEDPubMed
28698343DERIVEDPubMed
29239943DERIVEDPubMed
29550773DERIVEDPubMed
30621829DERIVEDPubMed
30721296DERIVEDPubMed
34243940DERIVEDPubMed
36130079DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
UH2AG050312Electroencephalograph Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENAVIDAN, MICHAEL SIMONWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING2014

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: Number of Participants With DeliriumTrial comparisons
EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: Number of Participants With Severe DeliriumTrial comparisons
EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
EEG Guided Protocol vs Control Arm: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02241655

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02241655/results?page=2