ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02655653-7983ae94

Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) vs Tranexamic Acid (TA): Reoperation

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) vs Tranexamic Acid (TA): Reoperation. Trial comparisons, record NCT02655653-7983ae94. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02655653-7983ae94

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.05360.01840.146wilson
Risk in group 20.0690.02710.164wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0154-0.1170.0861newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7770.1823.32log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7640.1633.58log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) than on Tranexamic Acid (TA)65from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)How many subjects were reoperated on?356OG000
Group 2Tranexamic Acid (TA)How many subjects were reoperated on?458OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Reoperation
Description
Confirmed diagnosis of reopeartion and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Time frame
Within 30 days after surgery
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid in Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery
NCT number
NCT02655653
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Bleeding
Interventions
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered, Tranexamic Acid administered
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Results first posted
2020-06-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02655653-7983ae94