ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02655653-c8c6f6cd

Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) vs Tranexamic Acid (TA): Mortality Within 30 Days Post-operation

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) vs Tranexamic Acid (TA): Mortality Within 30 Days Post-operation. Trial comparisons, record NCT02655653-c8c6f6cd. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02655653-c8c6f6cd

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01790.003160.0945wilson
Risk in group 20.01720.003050.0914wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.000616-0.0750.0785newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.066416.2log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.063217log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA) than on Tranexamic Acid (TA)1,620from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)How many subjects passed away?156OG000
Group 2Tranexamic Acid (TA)How many subjects passed away?158OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Mortality Within 30 Days Post-operation
Description
Time frame
Within 30 days after surgery
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid in Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery
NCT number
NCT02655653
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Bleeding
Interventions
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered, Tranexamic Acid administered
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Results first posted
2020-06-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02655653-c8c6f6cd