ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02697734-da959919

Osilodrostat Group vs Osilodrostat Placebo Group: Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete Response

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Osilodrostat Group vs Osilodrostat Placebo Group: Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete Response. Trial comparisons, record NCT02697734-da959919. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02697734-da959919

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7710.6350.867wilson
Risk in group 20.080.02220.25wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.6910.4730.803newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 29.642.5336.7log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 238.77.86190log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Osilodrostat Group than on Osilodrostat Placebo Group1.451.252.11from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Osilodrostat GroupParticipants in this arm were randomized to receive the study drug, osilodrostat, followed after Week 12 by open-label osilodrostat at the starting dose (with a second dose titration).3748OG000
Group 2Osilodrostat Placebo GroupParticipants in this arm were randomized to receive osilodrostat placebo followed after Week 12 by open-label osilodrostat at the starting dose (with a dose titration).225OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete Response
Description
A complete responder at week 12 is defined as a participant who had a mean urine free cortisol ≤ upper limit of normal (mUFC ≤ ULN) at Week 12.~Participants who had a missing mUFC assessment at Week 12 were counted as non-responders for the primary endpoint.
Time frame
at Week 12
Population
Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Osilodrostat in Cushing's Disease
NCT number
NCT02697734
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Cushing's Disease
Interventions
osilodrostat, osilodrostat Placebo
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2021-10-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02697734-da959919