ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02697734

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Osilodrostat in Cushing's Disease

NCT02697734, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-10-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Osilodrostat in Cushing's Disease. Trials, record NCT02697734. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02697734

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Osilodrostat in Cushing's Disease
NCT number
NCT02697734
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
73 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Cushing's Disease
Interventions
osilodrostat, osilodrostat Placebo
First posted
2016-03-03
Last updated
2021-11-01
Results first posted
2021-10-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes36

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete Responseat Week 12
A complete responder at week 12 is defined as a participant who had a mean urine free cortisol ≤ upper limit of normal (mUFC ≤ ULN) at Week 12. Participants who had a missing mUFC assessment at Week 12 were counted as non-responders for the primary endpoint.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With mUFC ≤ ULN at Week 36At Week 36
The complete response rate in both arms combined at Week 36. A complete responder at Week 36 is defined as a participant who had mean urine free cortisol \<= upper limit of normal (mUFC \<= ULN) at Week 36. Participants with missing mUFC at Week 36 were counted as non-responders.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in mUFCBaseline, weeks 2,5,8,12,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,36,40,48,60,72,84,96To assess the change in mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) from baseline by treatment arm.
SecondaryTime-to-first Control of mUFC - Number (%) of Participants With mUFC <=ULNup to 12 weeks
To assess time-to-first control of mUFC, (in days) from randomization to the first mUFC collection that was ≤ ULN before completion/discontinuation of placebo-controlled period. Participants who did not achieve post-baseline mUFC control were censored at discontinuation or completion of placebo-controlled period, whichever was earlier.
SecondaryTime-to-first Control of mUFC - Median Time to First Controlled mUFC Responseup to 12 weeks
To assess time-to-first control of mUFC, (in days) from randomization to the first mUFC collection that was ≤ ULN before completion/discontinuation of placebo-controlled period. Participants who did not achieve post-baseline mUFC control were censored at discontinuation or completion of placebo-controlled period, whichever was earlier. The median time-to-first control and corresponding two-sided 95% Confidence Interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology of Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982).
SecondaryTime-to-first Control of mUFC - % Event Probability Estimatesup to 12 weeks
To assess time-to-first control of mUFC, (in days) from randomization to the first mUFC collection that was ≤ ULN before completion/discontinuation of placebo-controlled period. Participants who did not achieve post-baseline mUFC control were censored at discontinuation or completion of placebo-controlled period, whichever was earlier. % Event probability estimate is the estimated probability that a participant will have an event prior to the specified time point. % Event probability estimates are obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for all treatment groups; Greenwood formula is used for Confidence Interval (CI) of Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.
SecondaryTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - Number (%) of Participantsup to 48 weeks
To assess time-to-escape from the first collection of normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the first mUFC \> 1.3 x ULN on two consecutive visits on the highest tolerated dose of osilodrostat and not related to a dose interruption or dose reduction due to safety reasons. Escape will not be assessed for participants during the first 26 weeks.
SecondaryTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - Median Time to Escape From Normal mUFCfrom week 26 to week 48
To assess time-to-escape from the first collection of normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the first mUFC \> 1.3 x ULN on two consecutive visits on the highest tolerated dose of osilodrostat and not related to a dose interruption or dose reduction due to safety reasons. Escape will not be assessed for participants during the first 26 weeks. The median time-to-escape and corresponding two-sided 95% Confidence Interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology of Brookmeyer and Crowley (1982).
SecondaryTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - % Event Probability Estimatesweek 26 and week 36
Escape is defined as the first loss of control of urinary free cortisol (UFC) that meets all of the following criteria: 1. prior normalization of UFC has occurred (median urinary free cortisol (mUFC)≤ upper limit of normal (ULN)); 2. patient reached the highest tolerated dose of osilodrostat; 3. 2 consecutive mUFC (collected at scheduled visits) were above 1.3x ULN; 4. the loss of control of UFC is not related to a dose interruption or dose reduction due to safety reasons; 5. happened beyond Week 26 when the patients have a chance to be treated with doses as high as 30 mg bid. * Event probability estimate is the estimated probability that a participant will have an event prior to the specified time point. * Event probability estimates are obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for all treatment groups; Greenwood formula is used for CI of KM estimates.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at the Femoral Neck, Hip and Spinal Cord - QC CorrectedBaseline, week 48
The change from baseline in bone mineral density at the femoral neck, hip and spinal cord at Week 48 by treatment arm - QC corrected. An increase in bone mineral density is indicative of an improvement.

Outcomes36

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete Responseat Week 12Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With mUFC ≤ ULN at Week 36At Week 36
Full Analysis Set participants: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of osilodrostat. Only a single arm is reported since the endpoint is 'To assess the complete response rate in both arms combined at Week 36 in patients receiving osilodrostat treatment.'
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in mUFCBaseline, weeks 2,5,8,12,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,36,40,48,60,72,84,96
Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo). The number analyzed varied from one visit to another because of missed visits, missed assessments, early discontinuation from the study, and completion of the extension phase.
nmol/24hrMEAN
SECONDARYTime-to-first Control of mUFC - Number (%) of Participants With mUFC <=ULNup to 12 weeksFull Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTime-to-first Control of mUFC - Median Time to First Controlled mUFC Responseup to 12 weeksFull Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo).DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime-to-first Control of mUFC - % Event Probability Estimatesup to 12 weeksFull Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo).Percent (event probability estimates)NUMBER
SECONDARYTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - Number (%) of Participantsup to 48 weeksFull Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - Median Time to Escape From Normal mUFCfrom week 26 to week 48Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo).daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime-to-escape During Osilodrostat Treatment From Collection of Normal mUFC (≤ ULN) to the First mUFC > 1.3 x ULN - % Event Probability Estimatesweek 26 and week 36Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo).Percent (event probability estimates)NUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at the Femoral Neck, Hip and Spinal Cord - QC CorrectedBaseline, week 48
Full Analysis Set: comprises all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (osilodrostat or placebo). The number analyzed varied from one visit to another because of missed visits, missed assessments, early discontinuation from the study, and completion of the extension phase.
g/cm2MEAN

Results by group385

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete ResponseOsilodrostat Group37Participants
Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete ResponseOsilodrostat Placebo Group2Participants
Percentage of Participants With mUFC ≤ ULN at Week 36All Participants Combined80.895% Confidence Interval 69.9 to 89.1Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Groupactual - baseline421.4Standard Deviation 291.25nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Placebo Groupactual - baseline451.5Standard Deviation 535.09nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Groupchange from baseline at week 2 (n=47,24)-139.3Standard Deviation 404.45nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Placebo Groupchange from baseline at week 2 (n=47,24)164.9Standard Deviation 543.82nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Groupchange from baseline at week 5 (n=46,25)-252.8Standard Deviation 338.48nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Placebo Groupchange from baseline at week 5 (n=46,25)-37.3Standard Deviation 280.84nmol/24hr
Change From Baseline in mUFCOsilodrostat Groupchange from baseline at week 8 (n=44,25)-330.2Standard Deviation 303.35nmol/24hr

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Core Phase - up to Week 48STARTEDOsilodrostat Group48
Core Phase - up to Week 48STARTEDOsilodrostat Placebo Group25
Core Phase - up to Week 48COMPLETEDOsilodrostat Group42
Core Phase - up to Week 48COMPLETEDOsilodrostat Placebo Group23
Core Phase - up to Week 48NOT COMPLETEDOsilodrostat Group6
Core Phase - up to Week 48NOT COMPLETEDOsilodrostat Placebo Group2
Optional Extension PhaseSTARTEDOsilodrostat Group38
Optional Extension PhaseSTARTEDOsilodrostat Placebo Group22
Optional Extension PhaseCOMPLETEDOsilodrostat Group33
Optional Extension PhaseCOMPLETEDOsilodrostat Placebo Group20

Adverse events425

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Controlled Period - Osilodrostat Arm.248
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Controlled Period - Placebo Arm.225
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOverall Study Period - Osilodrostat Arm.248
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOverall Study Period - Placebo Arm.125
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOverall Study Period - All Participants.373
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo Controlled Period - Osilodrostat Arm.048
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo Controlled Period - Placebo Arm.225
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersOverall Study Period - Osilodrostat Arm.248
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersOverall Study Period - Placebo Arm.025
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersOverall Study Period - All Participants.273

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Controlled Period - Osilodrostat Arm.048
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Controlled Period - Placebo Arm.025
Total, all-cause mortalityOverall Study Period - Osilodrostat Arm.048
Total, all-cause mortalityOverall Study Period - Placebo Arm.025
Total, all-cause mortalityOverall Study Period - All Participants.073
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Controlled Period - Osilodrostat Arm.4548
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Controlled Period - Placebo Arm.2125
Total, other adverse eventsOverall Study Period - Osilodrostat Arm.4748
Total, other adverse eventsOverall Study Period - Placebo Arm.2425
Total, other adverse eventsOverall Study Period - All Participants.7173

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35325149DERIVEDPubMed
39610378DERIVEDPubMed
41052284DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Osilodrostat Group vs Osilodrostat Placebo Group: Time-to-first Control of mUFC - Number (%) of Participants With mUFC <=ULNTrial comparisons
Osilodrostat Group vs Osilodrostat Placebo Group: Percentage of Randomized Participants With a Complete ResponseTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02697734

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02697734/registered?page=2