Comparison · NCT02741713-deaths
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block vs Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks: deaths from any cause
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block vs Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks: deaths from any cause. Trial comparisons, record NCT02741713-deaths. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02741713-deaths
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.176 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.168 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.168 | 0.176 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a group has no participants with the outcome | |||
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a cell of the two-by-two table is zero | |||
| Number needed to harm | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block | Twenty subjects will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block using the Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk location near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. A Sham Block of in area of PECS Pectoralis block will be done to allow for assessment of the intervention. Using the Solution for Injection in Sham Block.~Interscalene Block: An interscalene block will be performed on the subjects.~Sham Block~Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block: 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine~Solution for Injection in Sham Block: Lidocaine 1% | 0 | 18 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks | Twenty patients receive an ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block with Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block dosed at the upper trunk near the 6th cervical vertebral level, per standard clinical practice. For the Intervention, these subjects will also a PECS Pectoralis 1 and 2 Blocks using the Solution for Injection PECS Blocks, dosed at the PECS1 location and PECS2 location as described by Blanco, et al.~PECS Pectoralis 1 and 2 Blocks: An interscalene and a PECS Pectoralis 1 and 2 block will be performed on the subjects.~Interscalene Block: An interscalene block will be performed on the subjects.~Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block: 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine~Solution for Injection PECS Blocks: 10mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at the PECS1 location and 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and 1:600,000 clonidine dosed at t | 0 | 19 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, all-cause mortality
- Time frame
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery
- NCT number
- NCT02741713
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Biceps Tendonitis
- Interventions
- PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 Blocks, Interscalene Block, Sham Block, Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block, Solution for Injection in Sham Block, Solution for Injection PECS Blocks
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Results first posted
- 2018-08-27
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02741713?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02741713-deaths