ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02741713

Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery

NCT02741713, Phase 3, Completed, Wake Forest University Health Sciences; results first posted 2018-08-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery. Trials, record NCT02741713. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02741713

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Analgesic Benefit of PECS Blocks for Biceps Tenodesis Shoulder Surgery
NCT number
NCT02741713
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
40 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Conditions
Biceps Tendonitis
Interventions
PECS "Pectoralis" 1 and 2 Blocks, Interscalene Block, Sham Block, Solution for Injection in Interscalene Block, Solution for Injection in Sham Block, Solution for Injection PECS Blocks
First posted
2016-04-18
Last updated
2018-08-27
Results first posted
2018-08-27
Limitations and caveats
Only 8 patients in the PECS group reported the onset of axillary pain at home, so that data set is very limited.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPost-operative Axillary Pain6 hours post-block.
Post-operative ambulatory surgery subjects will be asked 6 hours after block placement about the presence of axillary pain at rest. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome.
SecondaryNumerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at RestAssessed 24hrs post-block on a scale from 0-10.
Subjects were asked about their overall shoulder pain during the followup phone call at 24hrs post-block. Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10) will be recorded with 0= no pain, 10=most pain possible. Higher scores denotes worse outcome.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or VomitingAssessed 24hrs post-block (yes/no)Any episodes during the first 24 hours will be recorded as a yes.
SecondaryTotal Opioid UsageAssessed 24hrs post-block in mgRecorded in oxycodone equivalents in the first 24 hours post-discharge from the PACU.
SecondaryTime From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary PainAssessed 24hrs post-block in hoursTime self-reported by patients in the Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks group during data collection phone call at 24 hours post-block.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPost-operative Axillary Pain6 hours post-block.units on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at RestAssessed 24hrs post-block on a scale from 0-10.units on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or VomitingAssessed 24hrs post-block (yes/no)percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTotal Opioid UsageAssessed 24hrs post-block in mgmgMEAN
SECONDARYTime From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary PainAssessed 24hrs post-block in hoursThis Outcome Measure was assessed only in the Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks groupHoursMEAN

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Post-operative Axillary PainInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block3Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 5.25units on a scale
Post-operative Axillary PainInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1.5units on a scale
Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at RestInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block6Inter-Quartile Range 5 to 7units on a scale
Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (0-10) at RestInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks6Inter-Quartile Range 4 to 7units on a scale
Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or VomitingInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block39percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Episodes of Nausea or VomitingInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks37percentage of participants
Total Opioid UsageInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block31.695% Confidence Interval 24.1 to 39.0mg
Total Opioid UsageInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks26.995% Confidence Interval 21.8 to 32.0mg
Time From Block Placement to Onset of Axillary PainInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks16.795% Confidence Interval 14.1 to 19.3Hours

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block20
Overall StudySTARTEDInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block18
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks19
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks1

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block018
Total, all-cause mortalityInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks019
Total, other adverse eventsInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block018
Total, other adverse eventsInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks019
Total, serious adverse eventsInterscalene Block Plus Sham Block018
Total, serious adverse eventsInterscalene Plus PECS Blocks019

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31136331DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block vs Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Interscalene Block Plus Sham Block vs Interscalene Plus PECS Blocks: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02741713

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02741713/registered