ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02763319-b16aebea

Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE. Trial comparisons, record NCT02763319-b16aebea. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02763319-b16aebea

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.8720.8210.91wilson
Risk in group 20.7070.6440.762wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1650.09020.239newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.231.121.36log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.831.744.62log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Tafasitamab + Bendamustine than on Rituximab + Bendamustine6.044.1911.1from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Tafasitamab + Bendamustine
Participants received intravenous (IV) tafasitamab 12.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in combination with IV bendamustine 90 mg/meters squared (m\^2) in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 3, participants received tafastiamab on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22, plus a loading dose on Day 4 of Cycle 1. Participants received bendamustine on either Days 2 and 3 or Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 1 to 6. Participants with an ongoing response of at least partial response at the end of Cycle 6, as per local assessment, continued tafasitamab or rituximab monotherapy per initially allocated treatment until disease progression. Treatment was stopped due to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever came first.
191219OG000
Group 2Rituximab + Bendamustine
Participants received IV rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 in combination with IV bendamustine 90 mg/m\^2 in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. Participants received rituximab on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression. Participants received bendamustine on either Days 2 and 3 or Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 1 to 6. Participants with an ongoing response of at least partial response at the end of Cycle 6, as per local assessment, continued tafasitamab or rituximab monotherapy per initially allocated treatment until disease progression. Treatment was stopped due to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever came first.
159225OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Description
AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 (or higher). Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms. Grade 2: moderate. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Grade 5: death. TEAEs were defined as any adverse events either reported for the first time or the worsening of pre-existing events after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug.
Time frame
up to 77 months
Population
Safety Analysis Set

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine (BEN) Versus Rituximab (RTX) With BEN in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT number
NCT02763319
Phases
PHASE2, PHASE3
Conditions
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Interventions
Rituximab (RTX), Tafasitamab, Bendamustine (BEN)
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Results first posted
2025-07-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02763319-b16aebea