ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02763319

A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine (BEN) Versus Rituximab (RTX) With BEN in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

NCT02763319, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Incyte Corporation; results first posted 2025-07-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine (BEN) Versus Rituximab (RTX) With BEN in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Trials, record NCT02763319. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02763319

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine (BEN) Versus Rituximab (RTX) With BEN in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT number
NCT02763319
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
453 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Conditions
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Interventions
Rituximab (RTX), Tafasitamab, Bendamustine (BEN)
First posted
2016-05-05
Last updated
2025-07-17
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-004689-11
Results first posted
2025-07-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes23

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 41.4 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to tumor progression or death from any cause.
PrimaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 46.5 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to tumor progression or death from any cause.
SecondaryBest Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 77 months
Best ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the best response achieved at any time during the study. Per International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
SecondaryBest ORR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 77 months
Best ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with CR or PR based on the best response achieved at any time during the study. Per International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 40.2 months
Duration of response was defined as the elapsed time (in months) between the date of the first documented response (CR or PR) and the following date of an event defined as the first documented progression (any new lesion or an increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death. Per International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 44.7 months
Duration of response was defined as the elapsed time (in months) between the date of the first documented response (CR or PR) and the following date of an event defined as the first documented progression (any new lesion or an increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death. Per International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Overall Populationup to 50.0 monthsOverall survival was defined as the time (in months) from randomization until death from any cause.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 50.6 monthsOverall survival was defined as the time (in months) from randomization until death from any cause.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 77 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) based on the best response achieved at any time during the study. Per the International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites; SD: failure to attain CR/PR or progressive disease (PD; any new lesion or an increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir).
SecondaryDCR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 77 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR, PR, or SD based on the best response achieved at any time during the study. Per the International Working Group response criteria: CR: the disappearance of all evidence of disease; PR: regression of measurable disease and no new sites; SD: failure to attain CR/PR or PD (any new lesion or an increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir).

Outcomes23

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 41.4 months
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who were randomized to either treatment arm. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment and stratification factors they were assigned to during the randomization procedure. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
monthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 46.5 months
Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Full Analysis Set: participants in the FAS with ≤100 NK cells/µL at Baseline. 95% CIs (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYBest Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 77 monthsFull Analysis Set. A 2-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact method based on binomial distribution was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYBest ORR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 77 monthsNatural Killer Cell Count-Low Full Analysis Set. A 2-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact method based on binomial distribution was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 40.2 months
Full Analysis Set. 95% CIs (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Only participants with CR or PR were analyzed.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 44.7 months
Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Full Analysis Set. 95% CIs (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Only participants with CR or PR were analyzed.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Overall Populationup to 50.0 monthsFull Analysis Set. 95% CIs (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 50.6 monthsNatural Killer Cell Count-Low Full Analysis Set. 95% CIs (Greenwood formula) for the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall Populationup to 77 monthsFull Analysis Set. A 2-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact method based on binomial distribution was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDCR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low Subgroupup to 77 monthsNatural Killer Cell Count-Low Full Analysis Set. A 2-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact method based on binomial distribution was used.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group234

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationTafasitamab + Bendamustine7.1095% Confidence Interval 5.800 to 8.500months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationRituximab + Bendamustine8.3095% Confidence Interval 5.600 to 11.500months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low SubgroupTafasitamab + Bendamustine5.6095% Confidence Interval 4.400 to 8.600months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low SubgroupRituximab + Bendamustine5.6095% Confidence Interval 3.600 to 10.000months
Best Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationTafasitamab + Bendamustine65.595% Confidence Interval 58.90 to 71.67percentage of participants
Best Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationRituximab + Bendamustine61.795% Confidence Interval 55.01 to 68.03percentage of participants
Best ORR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low SubgroupTafasitamab + Bendamustine64.895% Confidence Interval 53.86 to 74.66percentage of participants
Best ORR by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Natural Killer Cell Count-Low SubgroupRituximab + Bendamustine59.595% Confidence Interval 47.41 to 70.73percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationTafasitamab + Bendamustine7.4095% Confidence Interval 5.800 to 12.100months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response by Independent Radiology/Clinical Review Committee Assessment in the Overall PopulationRituximab + Bendamustine12.1095% Confidence Interval 10.000 to 23.300months

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTafasitamab + Bendamustine226
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab + Bendamustine227
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTafasitamab + Bendamustine0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab + Bendamustine0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTafasitamab + Bendamustine226
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab + Bendamustine227

Adverse events456

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTafasitamab + Bendamustine3121941
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRituximab + Bendamustine1522516
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsTafasitamab + Bendamustine1121914
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsRituximab + Bendamustine1022516
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTafasitamab + Bendamustine6021994
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Bendamustine4822573
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTafasitamab + Bendamustine1521919
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRituximab + Bendamustine1122511
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsTafasitamab + Bendamustine1221915
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsRituximab + Bendamustine822513

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTafasitamab + Bendamustine129226
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab + Bendamustine127227
Total, other adverse eventsTafasitamab + Bendamustine206219
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab + Bendamustine199225
Total, serious adverse eventsTafasitamab + Bendamustine115219
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab + Bendamustine100225

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAETrial comparisons
Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Trial comparisons
Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02763319

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02763319/registered?page=2