Comparison · NCT02763319-e86956c1
Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Tafasitamab + Bendamustine vs Rituximab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE). Trial comparisons, record NCT02763319-e86956c1. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02763319-e86956c1
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.982 | 0.954 | 0.993 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.956 | 0.92 | 0.976 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0262 | -0.0081 | 0.0633 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.03 | 0.994 | 1.06 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 2.5 | 0.772 | 8.09 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Tafasitamab + Bendamustine than on Rituximab + Bendamustine | 38.2 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Tafasitamab + Bendamustine | Participants received intravenous (IV) tafasitamab 12.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in combination with IV bendamustine 90 mg/meters squared (m\^2) in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 3, participants received tafastiamab on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22, plus a loading dose on Day 4 of Cycle 1. Participants received bendamustine on either Days 2 and 3 or Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 1 to 6. Participants with an ongoing response of at least partial response at the end of Cycle 6, as per local assessment, continued tafasitamab or rituximab monotherapy per initially allocated treatment until disease progression. Treatment was stopped due to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever came first. | 215 | 219 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Rituximab + Bendamustine | Participants received IV rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 in combination with IV bendamustine 90 mg/m\^2 in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. Participants received rituximab on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression. Participants received bendamustine on either Days 2 and 3 or Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 1 to 6. Participants with an ongoing response of at least partial response at the end of Cycle 6, as per local assessment, continued tafasitamab or rituximab monotherapy per initially allocated treatment until disease progression. Treatment was stopped due to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever came first. | 215 | 225 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
- Description
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship to this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not it was considered related to that study drug. TEAEs were defined as any adverse events either reported for the first time or the worsening of pre-existing events after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug.
- Time frame
- up to 77 months
- Population
- Safety Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of tafasitamab, bendamustine, or rituximab. Analyses were based on the actual treatment received.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab With Bendamustine (BEN) Versus Rituximab (RTX) With BEN in Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
- NCT number
- NCT02763319
- Phases
- PHASE2, PHASE3
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
- Interventions
- Rituximab (RTX), Tafasitamab, Bendamustine (BEN)
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Results first posted
- 2025-07-17
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02763319?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02763319-e86956c1