ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02877927-sae

Omadacycline vs Linezolid: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Omadacycline vs Linezolid: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02877927-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02877927-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01360.005820.0314wilson
Risk in group 20.01360.005830.0315wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.000037-0.01950.0194newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9970.2913.42log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9970.2863.47log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Omadacycline than on Linezolid27,000from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Omadacycline
Participants received omadacycline 450 milligrams (mg) orally every 24 hours (q24h) for 2 doses, followed by 300 mg orally q24h. The total treatment duration was 7 to 14 days. Participants received active omadacycline tablets and over-encapsulated linezolid placebo tablets.
5368EG000
Group 2Linezolid
Participants received linezolid 600 mg orally every 12 hours (q12h). The total treatment duration was 7 to 14 days. Participants received omadacycline placebo tablets and over-encapsulated active linezolid tablets.
5367EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were assessed from the signing of Informed Consent Form to the time of the Final Follow-up assessment (up to 30 to 37 days after the first dose of test article).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI
NCT number
NCT02877927
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
Interventions
Omadacycline, Linezolid
Lead sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Results first posted
2018-11-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02877927-sae