Trial · NCT02877927
Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI
NCT02877927, Phase 3, Completed, Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc; results first posted 2018-11-30
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI. Trials, record NCT02877927. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02877927
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI
- NCT number
- NCT02877927
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 735 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
- Conditions
- Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
- Interventions
- Omadacycline, Linezolid
- First posted
- 2016-08-24
- Last updated
- 2018-11-30
- Results first posted
- 2018-11-30
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes3
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Screening; 48 to 72 hours after the first dose of test article | Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, which is categorized as survival with at least a 20% reduction of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) primary lesion size compared to Screening measurements, without receiving any rescue antibacterial therapy. An indeterminate classification is used for a response that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Screening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy | At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: participant was alive; infection was sufficiently resolved such that further antibacterial therapy was not needed. Participants may have had some residual changes related to infection requiring ancillary treatment. Clinical Failure was defined as meeting any of the following criteria: infection required additional treatment with alternative antibacterial therapy; participant received antibacterial therapy between the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit and the PTE Visit that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; unplanned major surgical intervention for the infection under study between the EOT and PTE Visits; participant died before evaluation; other specified reason. Indeterminate The clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) Population | Screening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy | At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: participant was alive; infection was sufficiently resolved such that further antibacterial therapy was not needed. Participants may have had some residual changes related to infection requiring ancillary treatment. Clinical Failure was defined as meeting any of the following criteria: infection required additional treatment with alternative antibacterial therapy; participant received antibacterial therapy between the EOT Visit and the PTE Visit that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; unplanned major surgical intervention for the infection under study between the EOT and PTE Visits; participant died before evaluation; other specified reason. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes3
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Screening; 48 to 72 hours after the first dose of test article | Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized participants without a baseline sole Gram-negative ABSSSI pathogen | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| SECONDARY | Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Screening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy | mITT Population | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| SECONDARY | Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) Population | Screening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy | CE-PTE Population: all participants in the mITT Population meeting additional pre-defined criteria | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group16
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Omadacycline | Clinical success | 315 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Linezolid | Clinical success | 297 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Omadacycline | Clinical failure | 26 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Linezolid | Clinical failure | 32 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Omadacycline | Indeterminate | 19 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response | Linezolid | Indeterminate | 31 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Omadacycline | Clinical success | 303 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Linezolid | Clinical success | 291 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Omadacycline | Clinical failure | 12 | Participants | |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit | Linezolid | Clinical failure | 21 | Participants |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 results by groupParticipant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Omadacycline | 368 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Linezolid | 367 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Omadacycline | 314 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Linezolid | 310 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Omadacycline | 54 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Linezolid | 57 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events44
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Omadacycline | 111 | 368 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Linezolid | 28 | 367 | |
| other | Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Omadacycline | 62 | 368 | |
| other | Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Linezolid | 11 | 367 | |
| other | Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Omadacycline | 15 | 368 | |
| other | Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Linezolid | 10 | 367 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Omadacycline | 10 | 368 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Linezolid | 4 | 367 | |
| other | Wound infection | Infections and infestations | Omadacycline | 21 | 368 | |
| other | Wound infection | Infections and infestations | Linezolid | 16 | 367 |
1 to 10 of 44Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 44 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Omadacycline | 0 | 368 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Linezolid | 1 | 367 |
| Total, other adverse events | Omadacycline | 166 | 368 |
| Total, other adverse events | Linezolid | 83 | 367 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Omadacycline | 5 | 368 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Linezolid | 5 | 367 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers6
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons2
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Omadacycline vs Linezolid: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Omadacycline vs Linezolid: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02877927
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02877927/events?page=2