ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02877927

Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI

NCT02877927, Phase 3, Completed, Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc; results first posted 2018-11-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI. Trials, record NCT02877927. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02877927

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Oral Omadacycline vs. Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI
NCT number
NCT02877927
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
735 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Conditions
Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
Interventions
Omadacycline, Linezolid
First posted
2016-08-24
Last updated
2018-11-30
Results first posted
2018-11-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseScreening; 48 to 72 hours after the first dose of test article
Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, which is categorized as survival with at least a 20% reduction of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) primary lesion size compared to Screening measurements, without receiving any rescue antibacterial therapy. An indeterminate classification is used for a response that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitScreening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy
At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: participant was alive; infection was sufficiently resolved such that further antibacterial therapy was not needed. Participants may have had some residual changes related to infection requiring ancillary treatment. Clinical Failure was defined as meeting any of the following criteria: infection required additional treatment with alternative antibacterial therapy; participant received antibacterial therapy between the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit and the PTE Visit that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; unplanned major surgical intervention for the infection under study between the EOT and PTE Visits; participant died before evaluation; other specified reason. Indeterminate The clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) PopulationScreening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapy
At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: participant was alive; infection was sufficiently resolved such that further antibacterial therapy was not needed. Participants may have had some residual changes related to infection requiring ancillary treatment. Clinical Failure was defined as meeting any of the following criteria: infection required additional treatment with alternative antibacterial therapy; participant received antibacterial therapy between the EOT Visit and the PTE Visit that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; unplanned major surgical intervention for the infection under study between the EOT and PTE Visits; participant died before evaluation; other specified reason.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseScreening; 48 to 72 hours after the first dose of test articleModified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized participants without a baseline sole Gram-negative ABSSSI pathogenParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitScreening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapymITT PopulationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) PopulationScreening; 7 to 14 days after the last day of therapyCE-PTE Population: all participants in the mITT Population meeting additional pre-defined criteriaParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseOmadacyclineClinical success315Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseLinezolidClinical success297Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseOmadacyclineClinical failure26Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseLinezolidClinical failure32Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseOmadacyclineIndeterminate19Participants
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseLinezolidIndeterminate31Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitOmadacyclineClinical success303Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitLinezolidClinical success291Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitOmadacyclineClinical failure12Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the mITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitLinezolidClinical failure21Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOmadacycline368
Overall StudySTARTEDLinezolid367
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOmadacycline314
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLinezolid310
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOmadacycline54
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLinezolid57

Adverse events44

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersOmadacycline111368
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLinezolid28367
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersOmadacycline62368
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersLinezolid11367
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersOmadacycline15368
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinezolid10367
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersOmadacycline10368
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersLinezolid4367
otherWound infectionInfections and infestationsOmadacycline21368
otherWound infectionInfections and infestationsLinezolid16367

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOmadacycline0368
Total, all-cause mortalityLinezolid1367
Total, other adverse eventsOmadacycline166368
Total, other adverse eventsLinezolid83367
Total, serious adverse eventsOmadacycline5368
Total, serious adverse eventsLinezolid5367

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31367742DERIVEDPubMed
31474458DERIVEDPubMed
33326848DERIVEDPubMed
33458763DERIVEDPubMed
35776862DERIVEDPubMed
39461915DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Omadacycline vs Linezolid: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Omadacycline vs Linezolid: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02877927

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02877927/events?page=2