Comparison · NCT03222570-deaths
IPT-A Adaptive Treatment Strategy vs Usual Care: deaths from any cause
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Download JSON
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. IPT-A Adaptive Treatment Strategy vs Usual Care: deaths from any cause. Trial comparisons, record NCT03222570-deaths. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03222570-deaths
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0631 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.104 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.104 | 0.0631 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a group has no participants with the outcome | |||
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a cell of the two-by-two table is zero | |||
| Number needed to harm | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Group 2 names the comparator: usual care.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | IPT-A Adaptive Treatment Strategy | Adolescents begin with an initial treatment plan of 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents (IPT-A). Depressive symptoms will be assessed at week 4 and week 8 of therapy. If an adolescent demonstrates an insufficient response at either time point, the adolescent will be randomized a second time to either an increased dose of IPT-A (sessions scheduled twice per week for 4 weeks;16 sessions total) or the addition of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).~Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents: IPT-A is an evidence-based intervention that aims to decrease depressive symptoms by helping adolescents improve their relationships and interpersonal interactions. It addresses one or more of four interpersonal problem areas: grief, role disputes, role transitions, and interpersonal deficits. The primary treatment techniques in IPT-A include emotion identification/expression, linking interpersonal events to mood, communication analysis, communication skill building, decision analysis, role playing, and assignment of interpersonal experiments (i.e. homework). In clinical trials, depressed adolescents treated with IPT-A demonstrated fewer depressive symptoms and better psychosocial functioning post-treatment than adolescents in control conditions.~Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor: Fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, fluvoxamine, or sertraline | 0 | 57 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Usual Care | Therapists will implement therapy procedures that they usually use and believe to be effective in clinical practice. Therapists will use whatever methods they usually use to make decisions regarding the frequency of therapy sessions and whether to refer the adolescent to start an SSRI.~Usual Care: Therapists will implement therapy procedures that they usually use and believe to be effective in clinical practice. Therapists will use whatever methods they usually use to make decisions regarding the frequency of therapy sessions and whether to refer the adolescent to start an SSRI | 0 | 33 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, all-cause mortality
- Time frame
- 16 weeks
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- An Adaptive Algorithm-Based Approach to Treatment for Adolescent Depression
- NCT number
- NCT03222570
- Phases
- PHASE2
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Interventions
- Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, Usual Care
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Results first posted
- 2025-07-02
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03222570?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03222570-deaths