ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03442777-423434ca

Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter. Trial comparisons, record NCT03442777-423434ca. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03442777-423434ca

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.04030.03010.0539wilson
Risk in group 20.06310.04550.0869wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0227-0.0486-0.000534newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.6390.4130.991log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6240.3930.991log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) than on Control Group4420.61,870from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2)
Participants in intervention groups 1 and 2~* were cared for on the available support surfaces of the hospital (mattresses, cushions) for the duration of their hospital stay.~* received standard pressure ulcer prevention strategies (as described in the hospital protocol) which included ongoing risk assessment, regular repositioning and skin care.~* Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings were applied on dry intact skin on sacrum, heel right/left, greater trochanter right/left, in addition to standard pressure ulcer prevention.~* The maximum treatment duration was 14 days
431,066OG000
Group 2Control Group
Participants in control group~* were cared for on the available support surfaces of the hospital (mattresses, cushions) for the duration of their hospital stay.~* received standard pressure ulcer prevention strategies (as described in the hospital protocol) which included ongoing risk assessment, regular repositioning and skin care.~* No silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings were applied~* The maximum study duration was 14 days
34539OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter
Description
The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum, heels or greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days).~Patients in experimental groups 1 and 2 were pooled as the treatment group and compared to the control group (in the intention to treat population (n=1605)~Note: The International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2014)) distinguishes four categories of pressure ulcers: non-blanchable erythema of the intact skin (category I), partial thickness loss of dermis (category II), full thickness tissue loss (category III) and full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle (category IV). Also unstageable pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries can be recognised. https://npiap.com/
Time frame
assessment during 14 days
Population
Intention to treat population (n=1605)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Silicone Adhesive Multilayer Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Ulcer
NCT number
NCT03442777
Phases
NA
Conditions
Pressure Ulcer
Interventions
Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings, Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
Lead sponsor
Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre
Results first posted
2021-04-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03442777-423434ca