ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03442777

Silicone Adhesive Multilayer Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Ulcer

NCT03442777, Not applicable, Completed, Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre; results first posted 2021-04-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Silicone Adhesive Multilayer Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Ulcer. Trials, record NCT03442777. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03442777

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Silicone Adhesive Multilayer Foam Dressings to Prevent Pressure Ulcer
NCT number
NCT03442777
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
1,634 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre
Conditions
Pressure Ulcer
Interventions
Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings, Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
First posted
2018-02-22
Last updated
2021-04-26
Results first posted
2021-04-26
Limitations and caveats
Performance and detection bias may have occurred because patients, caregivers and study personnel could not be blinded to the study procedures/devices. All study nurses were trained, and for most hospitals wound care teams were involved when a PU occurred, further strengthening the correct identification of skin injuries.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanterassessment during 14 days
The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum, heels or greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). Patients in experimental groups 1 and 2 were pooled as the treatment group and compared to the control group (in the intention to treat population (n=1605) Note: The International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2014)) distinguishes four categories of pressure ulcers: non-blanchable erythema of the intact skin (category I), partial thickness loss of dermis (category II), full thickness tissue loss (category III) and full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle (category IV). Also unstageable pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries can be recognised. https://npiap.com/
OtherNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrummaximum treatment or study period 14 daysThe number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days).
OtherNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heelmaximum treatment or study period 14 daysThe number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any heel as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days).
OtherThe Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochantermaximum treatment or study period 14 daysThe number of patients who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days).

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanterassessment during 14 daysIntention to treat population (n=1605)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrummaximum treatment or study period 14 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heelmaximum treatment or study period 14 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDThe Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochantermaximum treatment or study period 14 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater TrochanterTreatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2)43Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater TrochanterControl Group34Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on SacrumTreatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2)30Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on SacrumControl Group26Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any HeelTreatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2)15Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any HeelControl Group10Participants
The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any TrochanterTreatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2)1Participants
The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any TrochanterControl Group0Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)542
Overall StudySTARTEDIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)545
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Group (Standard of Care)546
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)534
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)532
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Group (Standard of Care)539
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)13
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Group (Standard of Care)7

Adverse events16

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPressure ulcer developmentSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)15391
otherPressure ulcer developmentSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)25382
otherErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)45394
otherErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)45384
otherPruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)35393
otherPruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)15381
otherBlister formationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)25392
otherBlister formationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)15381
otherExacerbates athlete's footInfections and infestationsIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)05390
otherExacerbates athlete's footInfections and infestationsIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)15381

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)27539
Total, all-cause mortalityIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)23538
Total, other adverse eventsIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)16539
Total, other adverse eventsIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)12538
Total, serious adverse eventsIntervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care)0539
Total, serious adverse eventsIntervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care)0538

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33216969RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heel
Trial comparisons
Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochanter
Trial comparisons
Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter
Trial comparisons
Treatment Group (Defined in Protocol as Pooled Intervention Group 1 and Intervention Group 2) vs Control Group: Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on SacrumTrial comparisons
Intervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care) vs Intervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Intervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care) vs Intervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03442777

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03442777/registered