ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04026555-f1615aa9

Intervention - Alert Sent vs Control - No Alert Sent: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Cardiac Arrest Episode

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention - Alert Sent vs Control - No Alert Sent: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Cardiac Arrest Episode. Trial comparisons, record NCT04026555-f1615aa9. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04026555-f1615aa9

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.00257wilson
Risk in group 2000.00306wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.003060.00257newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treatfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Intervention - Alert Sent
A score predicting the likelihood that the patient will experience a deterioration in their clinical condition within six hours will be generated. If the prediction score exceeds a predetermined threshold, an alert will be sent to the provider.
01,488OG000
Group 2Control - No Alert Sent
A score predicting the likelihood that the patient will experience a deterioration in their clinical condition within six hours will be generated. Patients in the control arm will have a score calculated but no alert will be sent.
01,252OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Cardiac Arrest Episode
Description
The number of patients who had a cardiac arrest.
Time frame
10 months
Population
No statistical comparison performed due to no events.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Realtime Streaming Clinical Use Engine for Medical Escalation
NCT number
NCT04026555
Phases
NA
Conditions
Clinical Deterioration, Hospital Medicine, Monitoring, Physiologic
Interventions
MEWS++ Monitoring, Predictor Score
Lead sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Results first posted
2025-01-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04026555-f1615aa9