ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04141696-sae

Ketamine Administration vs Midazolam Administration: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ketamine Administration vs Midazolam Administration: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04141696-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04141696-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.324wilson
Risk in group 2000.324wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.3240.324newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Ketamine AdministrationParticipants receive ketamine 0.5 mg/kg intravenous infusion over 40 minutes followed by a two week washout period.08EG000
Group 2Midazolam AdministrationParticipants receive midazolam 0.045 mg/kg intravenous infusion over 40 minutes followed by a two week washout period.08EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Up to 14 days after each infusion intervention

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Proof-of-Concept Trial on the Effect of Ketamine on Fatigue
NCT number
NCT04141696
Phases
PHASE1, PHASE2
Conditions
Fatigue
Interventions
Ketamine, Midazolam
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Results first posted
2025-04-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04141696-sae