Trial ยท NCT04141696
A Proof-of-Concept Trial on the Effect of Ketamine on Fatigue
NCT04141696, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); results first posted 2025-04-15
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. A Proof-of-Concept Trial on the Effect of Ketamine on Fatigue. Trials, record NCT04141696. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04141696
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- A Proof-of-Concept Trial on the Effect of Ketamine on Fatigue
- NCT number
- NCT04141696
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 1, Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 10 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Conditions
- Fatigue
- Interventions
- Ketamine, Midazolam
- First posted
- 2019-10-28
- Last updated
- 2025-04-15
- Results first posted
- 2025-04-15
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes11
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale | Baseline to three days post infusion for each study arm | Percentage change in self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after a single intravenous dose of the study drug. The Fatigue VAS is a 0-100 mm scale widely used to assess fatigue in patients with chronic illness. Higher score indicates worse fatigue. Change in fatigue VAS scores measured as comparison of fatigue VAS scores collected at the first visit (baseline) and three days post infusion of study drug during each treatment arm (Ketamine, active comparator). Analysis is measured as the difference between day three score minus the baseline score, divided by the baseline score. |
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale - Day 7 | Up to 7 days post infusion for each study drug | Percentage change in self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after a single intravenous dose of the study drug. The Fatigue VAS is a 0-100 mm scale widely used to assess fatigue in patients with chronic illness. Higher score indicates worse fatigue. Change in fatigue VAS scores measured as comparison of fatigue VAS scores collected at the first visit (baseline) and seven days post infusion for each treatment arm (Ketamine, active comparator). Analysis is measured as the percentage change in day seven score minus the baseline score, divided by the baseline score. |
| Secondary | Areas Under the Curve (AUC) for Percentage Changes in Self-reported Fatigue VAS Score - Through Day 7 | Up to 7 days post infusion for each study drug | Percentage change in self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after a single intravenous dose of the study drug. The Fatigue VAS is a 0-100 mm scale widely used to assess fatigue in patients with chronic illness. Higher score indicates worse fatigue. Change in fatigue VAS scores measured as comparison of fatigue VAS scores collected at the first visit (baseline), and then 40, 80, 120, 230 minutes, and 1, 3, and 7 days post infusion for each treatment arm (Ketamine, active comparator). Analysis is measured as the areas under the curve. |
| Secondary | Mean Physical Activity Count Using Actigraphy | Day 7 post infusion | Mean physical activity count using actigraphy. Participants wore a portable device to monitor activity levels at day seven post infusion for each study drug. Analysis is measured as the mean of physical activity count on day seven post infusion for each treatment arm. |
| Secondary | Fatigue Level Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale | Day 7 post infusion | The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale is a 13-item questionnaire that measures level of fatigue symptoms. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (not al all) to 4 (very much) with total score ranging from 0 to 52. Lower score indicates greater fatigue. The Fatigue subscale was used to assess participant's level of fatigue at day seven post infusion for each study arm analyzed as the mean score. |
| Secondary | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety Domain | Day 7 post infusion | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile is a self-reported questionnaire assessing quality of life in various domains. The anxiety domain is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and converted into standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on a US general population. Higher scores indicate more anxiety. Participants completed the computerized adaptive test version of PROMIS anxiety subscale on day seven post infusion and analyzed as mean score. |
| Secondary | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression Domain | Day 7 post infusion | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile is a self-reported questionnaire assessing quality of life in various domains. The depression domain is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and converted into standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on a US general population. Higher score indicates worsening depression. Participants completed the computerized adaptive test version of PROMIS depression subscale on day seven post infusion and analyzed as mean score. |
| Secondary | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Fatigue Domain | Day 7 post infusion | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile is a self-reported questionnaire assessing quality of life in various domains. The fatigue domain is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and converted into standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on a US general population. Higher score indicates worsening fatigue. Participants completed the computerized adaptive test version of PROMIS fatigue subscale on day seven post infusion and analyzed as mean score. |
| Secondary | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Sleep Disturbance Domain | Day 7 post infusion | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) profile is a self-reported questionnaire assessing quality of life in various domains. The Sleep Disturbance domain is scored on a 5-point Likert scale and converted into standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on a US general population. Higher scores indicate worsening sleep disturbance being measured. Participants completed the computerized adaptive test version of PROMIS sleep disturbance subscale on day seven post infusion and analyzed as mean score. |
| Secondary | Fatigue Level Measured by Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale | Day 7 post infusion | The fatigue visual analogue scale (VAS) provides a simple method to assess fatigue. The Fatigue VAS is a 0-100 mm scale with 0 (no fatigue at all) to 100 (extreme fatigue). Higher score indicates worsening fatigue. Fatigue VAS score collected from all participants on day seven post infusion for each treatment arm and analyzed as mean score. |
1 to 10 of 11Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 11 registered outcomesOutcomes11
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale | Baseline to three days post infusion for each study arm | All participants who completed the study. | Percentage change | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale - Day 7 | Up to 7 days post infusion for each study drug | All participants who completed the study. | Percentage of change | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Areas Under the Curve (AUC) for Percentage Changes in Self-reported Fatigue VAS Score - Through Day 7 | Up to 7 days post infusion for each study drug | All participants who completed the study. | Percentage change*minutes | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Physical Activity Count Using Actigraphy | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | Count of activity | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Fatigue Level Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | Units on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety Domain | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | T Score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression Domain | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | T Score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Fatigue Domain | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | T Score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Sleep Disturbance Domain | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | T Score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Fatigue Level Measured by Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale | Day 7 post infusion | All participants who completed the study. | Units on a scale | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 11Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 11 outcomesResults by group22
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale | Ketamine Administration | -21.0 | Inter-Quartile Range -28.2 to -7.0 | Percentage change | |
| Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale | Midazolam Administration | -12.6 | Inter-Quartile Range -27.5 to -6.3 | Percentage change | |
| Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale - Day 7 | Ketamine Administration | -32.7 | Standard Deviation 33.9 | Percentage of change | |
| Percentage Change in Self-reported Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale - Day 7 | Midazolam Administration | -19.6 | Standard Deviation 22.4 | Percentage of change | |
| Areas Under the Curve (AUC) for Percentage Changes in Self-reported Fatigue VAS Score - Through Day 7 | Ketamine Administration | 497411 | Standard Deviation 239346 | Percentage change*minutes | |
| Areas Under the Curve (AUC) for Percentage Changes in Self-reported Fatigue VAS Score - Through Day 7 | Midazolam Administration | 518668 | Standard Deviation 250584 | Percentage change*minutes | |
| Mean Physical Activity Count Using Actigraphy | Ketamine Administration | 57.5 | Standard Deviation 37.0 | Count of activity | |
| Mean Physical Activity Count Using Actigraphy | Midazolam Administration | 70.4 | Standard Deviation 35.8 | Count of activity | |
| Fatigue Level Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale | Ketamine Administration | 33.8 | Standard Deviation 6.43 | Units on a scale | |
| Fatigue Level Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale | Midazolam Administration | 33.1 | Standard Deviation 6.92 | Units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 22Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 22 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 | STARTED | Ketamine Then Midazolam Administration | 4 | |
| Period 1 | STARTED | Midazolam Then Ketamine Administration | 4 | |
| Period 1 | COMPLETED | Ketamine Then Midazolam Administration | 4 | |
| Period 1 | COMPLETED | Midazolam Then Ketamine Administration | 4 | |
| Period 1 | NOT COMPLETED | Ketamine Then Midazolam Administration | 0 | |
| Period 1 | NOT COMPLETED | Midazolam Then Ketamine Administration | 0 | |
| Period 2 | STARTED | Ketamine Then Midazolam Administration | 4 | |
| Period 2 | STARTED | Midazolam Then Ketamine Administration | 4 | |
| Period 2 | COMPLETED | Ketamine Then Midazolam Administration | 4 | |
| Period 2 | COMPLETED | Midazolam Then Ketamine Administration | 4 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events94
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Ketamine Administration | 0 | 8 | |
| other | Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Midazolam Administration | 1 | 8 | |
| other | Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Ketamine Administration | 0 | 8 | |
| other | Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Midazolam Administration | 1 | 8 | |
| other | Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Ketamine Administration | 1 | 8 | |
| other | Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Midazolam Administration | 0 | 8 | |
| other | Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Ketamine Administration | 2 | 8 | |
| other | Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Midazolam Administration | 0 | 8 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Ketamine Administration | 3 | 8 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Midazolam Administration | 0 | 8 |
1 to 10 of 94Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 94 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Ketamine Administration | 0 | 8 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Midazolam Administration | 0 | 8 |
| Total, other adverse events | Ketamine Administration | 8 | 8 |
| Total, other adverse events | Midazolam Administration | 8 | 8 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Ketamine Administration | 0 | 8 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Midazolam Administration | 0 | 8 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers2
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons2
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Ketamine Administration vs Midazolam Administration: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Ketamine Administration vs Midazolam Administration: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04141696
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04141696/results?page=2