ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04196777-e84cab66

Intervention vs Baseline Period: Percentage of Cases Who Were Re-admitted to the Hospital or Presented to an Emergency Department or an Urgent Care Clinic

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention vs Baseline Period: Percentage of Cases Who Were Re-admitted to the Hospital or Presented to an Emergency Department or an Urgent Care Clinic. Trial comparisons, record NCT04196777-e84cab66. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04196777-e84cab66

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2150.1820.252wilson
Risk in group 20.1460.1280.167wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0690.03020.11newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.471.191.82log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.61.232.08log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Intervention than on Baseline Period14.59.0533.2from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1InterventionThis data shows the proportion of cases who had an unplanned visit (see above definition) during the 12-month audit-and-feedback period.113525OG000
Group 2Baseline PeriodThis data shows the proportion of cases who had an unplanned visit (see above definition) during the 24-month pre-intervention period.1861,272OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Percentage of Cases Who Were Re-admitted to the Hospital or Presented to an Emergency Department or an Urgent Care Clinic
Description
Return visits: sought urgent/emergent healthcare for any indication within 30 days of the patient's index urologic procedure. For this specific outcome measure, the numerator will be the number of patients who had a return visit for any reason within 30-days of the urologic procedure, and the denominator will be all patients at the site who underwent a qualifying urologic procedure.
Time frame
Within 30-days of the urologic procedure
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Audit-and-feedback to Improve Antimicrobial-prescribing Among Urologists
NCT number
NCT04196777
Phases
NA
Conditions
Urologic Diseases, Antibacterial Drug Adverse Reaction
Interventions
Audit-and-feedback
Lead sponsor
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Results first posted
2024-09-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04196777-e84cab66