ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04633447-c8f21d18

Main Study: Guselkumab vs Main Study: Placebo: Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Main Study: Guselkumab vs Main Study: Placebo: Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAEs). Trial comparisons, record NCT04633447-c8f21d18. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04633447-c8f21d18

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1710.0810.327wilson
Risk in group 2000.176wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.171-0.02630.327newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Main Study: Guselkumab than on Main Study: Placebo5.83from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Main Study: Guselkumab
Initially, participants received 3 intravenous (IV) induction doses of Guselkumab 400 milligrams (mg) every 4 weeks starting from Week 0 up to Week 8 followed by a subcutaneous (SC) maintenance regimen of Guselkumab 200 mg every 4 weeks starting from Week 12 until Week 48 in the main study along with a protocol defined 26-week Glucocorticoid (GC) taper regimen. Participants were then followed up for safety for 12 weeks until Week 60. With protocol amendment 5, IV induction was discontinued, and participants enrolled from that point onwards received Guselkumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks from Week 0 until Week 48 (end of treatment). Participants who did not enter LTE continued in the main study till Week 60.
635OG000
Group 2Main Study: Placebo
Initially, participants received 3 IV induction doses of Placebo matching to Guselkumab 400 mg every 4 weeks starting from Week 0 up to Week 8 followed by a SC maintenance regimen of placebo matching to Guselkumab 200 mg every 4 weeks starting from Week 12 until Week 48 in the main study along with a protocol defined 26-week GC taper regimen. Participants were then followed up for safety for 12 weeks until Week 60. With protocol amendment 5, IV induction was discontinued, and participants enrolled from that point onwards received placebo matching to guselkumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks from Week 0 until Week 48 (end of treatment). Participants who did not enter LTE continued in the main study till Week 60.
018OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)
Description
Number of participants with treatment emergent SAEs were reported. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Any AE occurred at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the end of the main study was considered to be treatment emergent.
Time frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 60
Population
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Evaluate Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With New-onset or Relapsing Giant Cell Arteritis
NCT number
NCT04633447
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Giant Cell Arteritis
Interventions
Guselkumab, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Results first posted
2025-07-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04633447-c8f21d18