ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT05714644-78c0074b

Mailed FIT Kit vs Cologuard: Diagnostic Colonoscopy Completion Rates

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Mailed FIT Kit vs Cologuard: Diagnostic Colonoscopy Completion Rates. Trial comparisons, record NCT05714644-78c0074b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT05714644-78c0074b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.310.1910.46wilson
Risk in group 20.3970.2810.525wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.087-0.2620.103newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7810.4491.36log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6820.2951.58log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Mailed FIT Kit than on Cologuard11.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Mailed FIT KitA FIT kit mailed to the patient's home1342OG000
Group 2CologuardA Cologuard test mailed to the patient's home2358OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Diagnostic Colonoscopy Completion Rates
Description
completion rate of diagnostic colonoscopy after an abnormal stool test result (overall and by arm)
Time frame
6 months
Population
The number is for participants who returned an abnormal stool test within 180 days.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Community Collaboration to Advance Racial/Ethnic Equity in CRC Screening
NCT number
NCT05714644
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer
Interventions
FIT kit Screening Test, Cologuard Screening Test
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Results first posted
2025-12-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT05714644-78c0074b