ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT05714644-cb918a94

Mailed FIT Kit vs Cologuard: CRC Screening Completion Rates

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Mailed FIT Kit vs Cologuard: CRC Screening Completion Rates. Trial comparisons, record NCT05714644-cb918a94. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT05714644-cb918a94

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2260.210.243wilson
Risk in group 20.2790.2620.296wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0531-0.0767-0.0293newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.810.7360.891log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7540.6640.856log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Mailed FIT Kit than on Cologuard18.81334.1from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Mailed FIT KitA FIT kit mailed to the patient's home5502,435OG000
Group 2CologuardA Cologuard test mailed to the patient's home7512,692OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
CRC Screening Completion Rates
Description
completion rate of the stool-based screening test (FIT or Cologuard)
Time frame
3 months
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Community Collaboration to Advance Racial/Ethnic Equity in CRC Screening
NCT number
NCT05714644
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer
Interventions
FIT kit Screening Test, Cologuard Screening Test
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Results first posted
2025-12-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT05714644-cb918a94