ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last2,081 to 2,100 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
All TNFi Initiators Combination vs Tofacitinib Initiators Combination: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi Combination With MTX1,224 of 4,013

19 of 90

9.4 points

-0.2 to 16.7

4,103NCT05576051

To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting.

Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects Hospitalized in Last 6 Months at the Post Trial Interview82 of 2,047

79 of 2,048

0.1 points

-1.1 to 1.4

4,095NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects Alive at the Post Trial Interview2,018 of 2,047

2,023 of 2,048

-0.2 points

-0.9 to 0.5

4,095NCT00141102

Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis

Interactive Two-way SMS Dialogue vs No SMS Control: Initiation of Early Breastfeeding1,510 of 2,088

1,402 of 2,007

2.5 points

-0.3 to 5.2

4,095NCT04598165

Mobile WACh NEO: Mobile Solutions for Neonatal Health and Maternal Support

Telepharmacist Intervention vs Usual Care: Healthcare Utilization - Hospitalizations170 of 2,038

156 of 2,040

0.7 points

-1.0 to 2.4

4,078NCT02512276

Tele-Pharmacy Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence

Telepharmacist Intervention vs Usual Care: Healthcare Utilization - ER Visits90 of 2,038

113 of 2,040

-1.1 points

-2.5 to 0.2

4,078NCT02512276

Tele-Pharmacy Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence

Telepharmacist Intervention vs Usual Care: Healthcare Utilization - Office Visits641 of 2,038

594 of 2,040

2.3 points

-0.5 to 5.2

4,078NCT02512276

Tele-Pharmacy Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence

Mortality Pre-TIF Introduction vs Mortality Post-TIF Introduction: Mortality47 of 2,067

22 of 2,010

1.2 points

0.4 to 2.0

4,077NCT04547192

Improving Initial Management of the Injured at Ghanaian District and Regional Hospitals With a Trauma Intake Form

Mortality Pre-TIF Introduction vs Mortality Post-TIF Introduction: deaths from any cause47 of 2,067

22 of 2,010

1.2 points

0.4 to 2.0

4,077NCT04547192

Improving Initial Management of the Injured at Ghanaian District and Regional Hospitals With a Trauma Intake Form

Mortality Pre-TIF Introduction vs Mortality Post-TIF Introduction: serious adverse events24 of 2,067

6 of 2,010

0.9 points

0.3 to 1.4

4,077NCT04547192

Improving Initial Management of the Injured at Ghanaian District and Regional Hospitals With a Trauma Intake Form

Positive Berlin Questionaires vs Negative Berlin Questionnaires: Diagnosis of Pre-eclampsia Among Subjects With Positive Berlin Questionnaires135 of 1,343

49 of 2,731

8.3 points

6.7 to 10.0

4,074NCT00462306

Incidence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy

Rapid HIV Testing w/ Counseling (Group 1) vs Rapid HIV Testing & Information Only (Group 2): STI Incidence250 of 2,039

226 of 2,032

1.1 points

-0.8 to 3.1

4,071NCT01154296

HIV Rapid Testing & Counseling in Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinics in the U.S.

Active Antihypertensive Treatment vs Usual Care: A Combination of Death Within 14 Days After Randomization and Major Disability at 14 Days or at Hospital Discharge if Earlier Than 14 Days.683 of 2,038

681 of 2,033

0.0 points

-2.9 to 2.9

4,071NCT01840072

China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Treatment - Participation in Nurse Family Partnership vs Control: Number of Participants With a Tdap Vaccination (27-36 Weeks)914 of 2,723

446 of 1,347

0.5 points

-2.6 to 3.5

4,070NCT03360539

Nurse-Family Partnership Impact Evaluation in South Carolina

High Dose Multivitamin vs Low Dose Multivitamin: Recurrent or de Novo Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Defined as the Occurrence of Non-fatal or Fatal Arteriosclerotic Outcomes Including Coronary Heart, Cerebrovascular, and Peripheral Vascular Disease Events269 of 2,029

278 of 2,029

-0.4 points

-2.5 to 1.7

4,058NCT00064753

Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction In Transplantation (FAVORIT)

High Dose Multivitamin vs Low Dose Multivitamin: Renal Graft Failure181 of 2,029

162 of 2,029

0.9 points

-0.8 to 2.7

4,058NCT00064753

Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction In Transplantation (FAVORIT)

With BPH vs Without BPH: Risk Factors for Incidence Rate of Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) of Tolterodine - Comorbidity of Prostatic Hypertrophy319 of 2,203

130 of 1,855

7.5 points

5.6 to 9.3

4,058NCT01488578

Tolterodine Drug Use Investigation.(Post Marketing Commitment Plan)

qHPV Vaccine in Base Study vs Placebo in Base Study: Base Study: Number of Participants With Severe Injection Site Adverse Experiences (AEs)25 of 2,020

20 of 2,029

0.3 points

-0.4 to 0.9

4,049NCT00090285

An Investigational Study of Gardasil™ (qHPV Vaccine) in Reducing the Incidence of Anogenital Warts in Young Men (V501-020)

GSK2340274A Group vs GSK2340273A Group: deaths from any cause6 of 2,025

1 of 2,023

0.2 points

-0.0 to 0.6

4,048NCT00979602

Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Efficacy of H1N1 Vaccines in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older

GSK2340274A Group vs GSK2340273A Group: serious adverse events84 of 2,025

73 of 2,023

0.5 points

-0.7 to 1.7

4,048NCT00979602

Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Efficacy of H1N1 Vaccines in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=105"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=105

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT05576051-8923d4e6",
        "title": "All TNFi Initiators Combination vs Tofacitinib Initiators Combination: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi Combination With MTX",
        "summary": "1224 of 4013 against 19 of 90; risk difference 9.4 points, 95% interval -0.2 to 16.7; NCT05576051, To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting.",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT05576051-8923d4e6",
        "nct_id": "NCT05576051",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 4103,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.09389761054351134,
          "lower": -0.0023704847397606754,
          "upper": 0.16692187106859988
        },
        "group_1": "1,224 of 4,013",
        "group_2": "19 of 90",
        "difference": "9.4 points",
        "interval": "-0.2 to 16.7",
        "trial_title": "To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting."
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00141102-278f4495",
        "title": "Celecoxib vs Oral Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole: Number of Subjects Hospitalized in Last 6 Months at the Post Trial Interview",
        "summary": "82 of 2047 against 79 of 2048; risk difference 0.1 points, 95% interval -1.1 to 1.4; NCT00141102, Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00141102-278f4495",
        "nct_id": "NCT00141102",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 4095,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.0014844036242061542,
          "lower": -0.010524506321263751,
          "upper": 0.013511999897525575
        },
        "group_1": "82 of 2,047",
        "group_2": "79 of 2,048",
        "difference": "0.1 points",
        "interval": "-1.1 to 1.4",
        "trial_title": "Study Of Celecoxib Or Diclofenac And Omeprazole For Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety In High GI Risk Patients With Arthritis"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=106",
  "request_id": "vYsdORSFh8Xar2hL"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?