ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last3,621 to 3,640 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)7 of 948

13 of 957

-0.6 points

-1.6 to 0.3

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)29 of 948

30 of 957

-0.1 points

-1.7 to 1.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Protocol Defined MI53 of 948

68 of 957

-1.5 points

-3.7 to 0.7

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)97 of 948

57 of 957

4.3 points

1.8 to 6.8

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Stroke (Ischemic Stroke, and Hemorrhagic Stroke)10 of 948

18 of 957

-0.8 points

-2.0 to 0.3

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)153 of 948

92 of 957

6.5 points

3.5 to 9.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Ischemia Driven Revascularizations114 of 948

67 of 957

5.0 points

2.4 to 7.7

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Protocol Defined MI46 of 948

68 of 957

-2.3 points

-4.4 to -0.1

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (Cardiac Death and Non-cardiac Death)95 of 948

68 of 957

2.9 points

0.4 to 5.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Death, Protocol Defined MI, Protocol Defined Stroke or Unplanned Revascularization for Ischemia213 of 948

176 of 957

4.1 points

0.5 to 7.7

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All-cause Death, Protocol Defined MI or Protocol Defined Stroke173 of 948

154 of 957

2.2 points

-1.2 to 5.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All-cause Death, Protocol Defined MI or Protocol Defined Stroke203 of 948

176 of 957

3.0 points

-0.6 to 6.6

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Bleeding69 of 948

123 of 957

-5.6 points

-8.3 to -2.9

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (Cardiac Death and Non-cardiac Death)54 of 948

44 of 957

1.1 points

-0.9 to 3.1

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)63 of 948

42 of 957

2.3 points

0.2 to 4.4

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Stroke (Ischemic Stroke, and Hemorrhagic Stroke)17 of 948

22 of 957

-0.5 points

-1.8 to 0.8

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (Cardiac Death and Non-cardiac Death)31 of 948

33 of 957

-0.2 points

-1.8 to 1.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Death, Protocol Defined MI, Protocol Defined Stroke or Unplanned Revascularization for Ischemia121 of 948

129 of 957

-0.7 points

-3.8 to 2.3

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Protocol Defined MI64 of 948

73 of 957

-0.9 points

-3.2 to 1.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Graft Stenosis or Occlusion0 of 948

11 of 957

-1.1 points

-2.0 to -0.5

1,905NCT01205776

EXCEL Clinical Trial

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=182"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=182

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT01205776-5150e858",
        "title": "Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)",
        "summary": "7 of 948 against 13 of 957; risk difference -0.6 points, 95% interval -1.6 to 0.3; NCT01205776, EXCEL Clinical Trial",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01205776-5150e858",
        "nct_id": "NCT01205776",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 1905,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.006200150787667155,
          "lower": -0.016449582124255506,
          "upper": 0.0034014627396673474
        },
        "group_1": "7 of 948",
        "group_2": "13 of 957",
        "difference": "-0.6 points",
        "interval": "-1.6 to 0.3",
        "trial_title": "EXCEL Clinical Trial"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT01205776-52eeb913",
        "title": "Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With All Revascularizations (Ischemia Driven and Not Ischemia Driven)",
        "summary": "29 of 948 against 30 of 957; risk difference -0.1 points, 95% interval -1.7 to 1.5; NCT01205776, EXCEL Clinical Trial",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT01205776-52eeb913",
        "nct_id": "NCT01205776",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 1905,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.0007572450828670779,
          "lower": -0.01672898897573397,
          "upper": 0.015226096515806305
        },
        "group_1": "29 of 948",
        "group_2": "30 of 957",
        "difference": "-0.1 points",
        "interval": "-1.7 to 1.5",
        "trial_title": "EXCEL Clinical Trial"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=183",
  "request_id": "YFPpbj82-r1JE6SX"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?