ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 2026-11-10.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last881 to 900 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Coronary Revascularisation155 of 5,479

186 of 5,438

-0.6 points

-1.2 to 0.1

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Unstable Angina114 of 5,479

105 of 5,438

0.1 points

-0.4 to 0.7

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Acute Myocardial Infarction199 of 5,479

226 of 5,438

-0.5 points

-1.3 to 0.2

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: Cardiovascular Death, or Hospitalisation for Acute Myocardial Infarction606 of 5,479

593 of 5,438

0.2 points

-1.0 to 1.3

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Acute Coronary Syndrome (Unstable Angina or Acute Myocardial Infarction)303 of 5,479

317 of 5,438

-0.3 points

-1.2 to 0.6

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: Cardiovascular Death469 of 5,479

435 of 5,438

0.6 points

-0.5 to 1.6

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: All-cause of Mortality572 of 5,479

547 of 5,438

0.4 points

-0.8 to 1.5

10,917NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Ivabradine vs Placebo: serious adverse events1,625 of 5,477

1,770 of 5,430

-2.9 points

-4.7 to -1.2

10,907NCT00143507

The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Receives OUD-CDS vs Does Not Receive the OUD-CDS: Number of Patients With a MOUD Order or Referral785 of 5,538

517 of 5,353

4.5 points

3.3 to 5.7

10,891NCT04198428

Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings (COMPUTE 2.0)

Receives OUD-CDS vs Does Not Receive the OUD-CDS: Number of Patients With Naloxone Rescue Kit Order80 of 5,538

40 of 5,353

0.7 points

0.3 to 1.1

10,891NCT04198428

Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings (COMPUTE 2.0)

Intervention vs Control Group: Number Suspected/Diagnosed With Rifampin-resistant TB2 of 5,637

5 of 5,201

-0.1 points

-0.2 to 0.0

10,838NCT03044158

GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care

Pre-implementation vs Post-implementation: Change in Mental Health and Substance Use Screening Rates2,008 of 5,706

2,379 of 5,115

-11.3 points

-13.2 to -9.5

10,821NCT03217058

Computerized Substance Use and Depression Screening and Behavioral Treatment in HIV Primary Care

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Requiring Additional Treatment Interventions (Not Responding to the MOTIVE Bundle).219 of 5,921

637 of 4,899

-9.3 points

-10.4 to -8.3

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving Misoprostol for PPH2,601 of 5,921

2,732 of 4,899

-11.8 points

-13.7 to -10.0

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving Intravenous Fluids (IV) for PPH5,884 of 5,921

4,199 of 4,899

13.7 points

12.7 to 14.7

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving TXA for PPH5,829 of 5,921

1,983 of 4,899

58.0 points

56.5 to 59.4

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving Any Treatment Uterotonic for PPH5,909 of 5,921

4,541 of 4,899

7.1 points

6.4 to 7.9

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Bundle Usage for PPH up to 2 Hours Postpartum (or up to 24 Hours if Bleeding Continues)5,783 of 5,921

1,725 of 4,899

62.5 points

61.0 to 63.8

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving Examination of the Genital Tract5,506 of 5,921

3,608 of 4,899

19.3 points

18.0 to 20.7

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

E-MOTIVE Intervention vs Usual Care: Number of Women Receiving Oxytocin for PPH5,897 of 5,921

4,321 of 4,899

11.4 points

10.5 to 12.3

10,820NCT04341662

A Clinical Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Care Bundle to Prevent Bleeding After a Woman Has Given Birth

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=45

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT00143507-80844f9e",
        "title": "Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Coronary Revascularisation",
        "summary": "155 of 5479 against 186 of 5438; risk difference -0.6 points, 95% interval -1.2 to 0.1; NCT00143507, The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00143507-80844f9e",
        "nct_id": "NCT00143507",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 10917,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.005913917467885839,
          "lower": -0.012493253368131247,
          "upper": 0.0006236505515892611
        },
        "group_1": "155 of 5,479",
        "group_2": "186 of 5,438",
        "difference": "-0.6 points",
        "interval": "-1.2 to 0.1",
        "trial_title": "The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00143507-a5482f9f",
        "title": "Ivabradine vs Placebo: Hospitalisation for Unstable Angina",
        "summary": "114 of 5479 against 105 of 5438; risk difference 0.1 points, 95% interval -0.4 to 0.7; NCT00143507, The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00143507-a5482f9f",
        "nct_id": "NCT00143507",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 10917,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.001498147227157274,
          "lower": -0.003797337701753961,
          "upper": 0.0068040231257648735
        },
        "group_1": "114 of 5,479",
        "group_2": "105 of 5,438",
        "difference": "0.1 points",
        "interval": "-0.4 to 0.7",
        "trial_title": "The BEAUTIFUL Study: Effects of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "None stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=46",
  "request_id": "FOQmfmpud24liC22"
}
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0Next page

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Open193,990 genes2026-11-11

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Open611,552 trials2026-11-12

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

For invited accounts.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

By invitation39,249,078 sequences2026-11-05

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?