ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005184

Comparisons in its trials52

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Napabucasin Plus Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population) vs Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population): Number of Patients With Adverse Events560 of 561543 of 5471,108NCT02993731Trial comparisons
Napabucasin Plus Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population) vs Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population): deaths from any cause419 of 561400 of 5471,108NCT02993731Trial comparisons
Napabucasin Plus Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population) vs Nab-paclitaxel With Gemcitabine (Safety Population): serious adverse events330 of 561273 of 5471,108NCT02993731Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)8 of 3254 of 156481NCT02715804Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)325 of 325156 of 156481NCT02715804Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: deaths from any cause222 of 325106 of 156481NCT02715804Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Placebo + Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: serious adverse events187 of 32580 of 156481NCT02715804Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: deaths from any cause131 of 16687 of 113279NCT01839487Trial comparisons
PAG: PEGPH20 + Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs AG: Nab-paclitaxel + Gemcitabine: serious adverse events101 of 16058 of 100260NCT01839487Trial comparisons
GEMPAX vs Control: deaths from any cause131 of 14068 of 71211NCT03943667Trial comparisons
GEMPAX vs Control: serious adverse events71 of 14026 of 71211NCT03943667Trial comparisons
Arm 1 (mFOLFIRINOX + Surgery + FOLFOX) vs Arm 2 (mFOLFIRINOX + Radiation + Surgery + FOLFOXx): Incidence of Adverse Events Assessed Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4 and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the CTCAE
66 of 6655 of 55121NCT02839343Trial comparisons
Arm 1 (mFOLFIRINOX + Surgery + FOLFOX) vs Arm 2 (mFOLFIRINOX + Radiation + Surgery + FOLFOXx): deaths from any cause42 of 6626 of 55121NCT02839343Trial comparisons
Arm 1 (mFOLFIRINOX + Surgery + FOLFOX) vs Arm 2 (mFOLFIRINOX + Radiation + Surgery + FOLFOXx): serious adverse events33 of 6628 of 55121NCT02839343Trial comparisons
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX vs Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P: Number of Participants With a Response Following Preoperative Chemotherapy, Including Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial Response, Per RECIST 1.1.
5 of 5510 of 47102NCT02562716Trial comparisons
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX vs Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P: Number of Patients Going to Surgery for Resection After Preoperative Chemotherapy.40 of 5533 of 47102NCT02562716Trial comparisons
mFOLFIRINOX->Surg->mFOLFIRINOX vs Gem/Nab-P->Surg->Gem/Nab-P: deaths from any cause32 of 5532 of 47102NCT02562716Trial comparisons
mFOLFIRINOX->Surg->mFOLFIRINOX vs Gem/Nab-P->Surg->Gem/Nab-P: serious adverse events3 of 535 of 4598NCT02562716Trial comparisons
All Eligible - FOLFIRINOX + Radiation vs Resected Participants - FOLFIRINOX + Radiation: Rate of R0 Resection31 of 4831 of 3280NCT01591733Trial comparisons
Arm 1 - Acalabrutinib Monotherapy vs Arm 2- Acalabrutinib+Pembrolizumab: deaths from any cause30 of 3534 of 3873NCT02362048Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005184/comparisons