ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005264

Comparisons in its trials26

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of a Composite of Recurrent Stroke or SE at 18 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
1,095 of 7,7961,272 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of a Composite of Recurrent Stroke or SE at 6 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
2,061 of 7,7962,393 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of a Composite of Recurrent Stroke or SE at 0 Month: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
7,796 of 7,79611,601 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of Major Bleeding at 18 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
1,110 of 7,7961,283 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of Major Bleeding at 24 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
850 of 7,7961,028 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of Major Bleeding at 0 Month: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
7,796 of 7,79611,601 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of a Composite of Recurrent Stroke or SE at 24 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
845 of 7,7961,024 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of a Composite of Recurrent Stroke or SE at 12 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
1,426 of 7,7961,670 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of Major Bleeding at 12 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
1,448 of 7,7961,685 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Apixaban vs Secondary Prevention Cohort (Balanced): Warfarin: Number of Participants With Risk of Major Bleeding at 6 Months: Secondary Prevention (Balanced) Cohorts
2,081 of 7,7962,412 of 11,60119,397NCT05321810Trial comparisons
Tenecteplase (tNK) vs Control (Antiplatelet Agents): Number of Participants With Return to Baseline Neurological Functioning Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)309 of 432338 of 452884NCT02398656Trial comparisons
Tenecteplase (tNK) vs Control (Antiplatelet Agents): Number of Participants With Modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1 at 90 Days298 of 432321 of 452884NCT02398656Trial comparisons
Tenecteplase (tNK) vs Control (Antiplatelet Agents): serious adverse events16 of 4322 of 452884NCT02398656Trial comparisons
Tenecteplase (tNK) vs Control (Antiplatelet Agents): deaths from any cause20 of 4255 of 442867NCT02398656Trial comparisons
Stent Group vs Medical Therapy Group: serious adverse events30 of 5820 of 53111NCT00816166Trial comparisons
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs Dabigatran 150mg BID: Any Parenchymal Haemorrhage (PH1 or PH2)3 of 373 of 64101NCT02415855Trial comparisons
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs Dabigatran 150mg BID: Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation Rate (PH2)0 of 370 of 64101NCT02415855Trial comparisons
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs Dabigatran 150mg BID: Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation Rate0 of 370 of 64101NCT02415855Trial comparisons
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs Dabigatran 150mg BID: Systemic Hemorrhagic Complication Rate0 of 370 of 64101NCT02415855Trial comparisons
Dabigatran 110 mg BID vs Dabigatran 150mg BID: deaths from any cause1 of 370 of 64101NCT02415855Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005264/comparisons