ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0007243

Comparisons in its trials19

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
With EPOCH-R (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) vs EPOCH Alone (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, and Cyclophosphamide): Overall Response (Complete Response + Partial Response)
216 of 23594 of 112347NCT00001337Trial comparisons
With EPOCH-R (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) vs EPOCH Alone (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, and Cyclophosphamide): Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
235 of 235112 of 112347NCT00001337Trial comparisons
With EPOCH-R (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) vs EPOCH Alone (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, and Cyclophosphamide): Progression Free Survival (PFS)73 of 23541 of 112347NCT00001337Trial comparisons
With EPOCH-R (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) vs EPOCH Alone (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, and Cyclophosphamide): deaths from any cause28 of 23513 of 112347NCT00001337Trial comparisons
With EPOCH-R (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab) vs EPOCH Alone (Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Prednisone, and Cyclophosphamide): serious adverse events146 of 23544 of 112347NCT00001337Trial comparisons
Tisagenlecleucel - Post-infusion vs Tisagenlecleucel - Pre-infusion Deaths: deaths from any cause17 of 331 of 3467NCT03610724Trial comparisons
Conventional Care vs Intensive Insulin: serious adverse events9 of 2510 of 2651NCT00500240Trial comparisons
Part 2: Ibrutinib+CIT (RICE or RVICI) vs Part 2: Chemoimmunotherapy: Part 2: Number of Participants Who Proceeded to Stem Cell Transplantation13 of 357 of 1651NCT02703272Trial comparisons
Regimen A (R-CODOX-M Chemotherapy) vs Regimen B (Rituximab and IVAC Chemotherapy): serious adverse events0 of 223 of 3234NCT00392834Trial comparisons
Part 1: Ibrutinib vs Part 2: Ibrutinib: Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Greater Than (>) 90% Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Occupancy5 of 155 of 1328NCT02703272Trial comparisons
Part 2: Ibrutinib+CIT (RICE or RVICI) vs Part 2: Chemoimmunotherapy: Part 2: Number of Participants With c-MYC Gene Rearrangement1 of 181 of 927NCT02703272Trial comparisons
High Risk - Treated With Alternating R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC Cycles vs Low Risk - Treatment With 3 Cycles of R-CODOX-M: deaths from any cause4 of 200 of 525NCT00392990Trial comparisons
High Risk - Treated With Alternating R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC Cycles vs Low Risk - Treatment With 3 Cycles of R-CODOX-M: serious adverse events20 of 202 of 525NCT00392990Trial comparisons
Low Risk vs High Risk: Response Rates (CR and PR) in Adults With Burkitt/Atypical Burkitt2 of 27 of 810NCT00126191Trial comparisons
Low Risk vs High Risk: serious adverse events1 of 22 of 810NCT00126191Trial comparisons
Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Original: 30mg Copanlisib vs Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Modified: 30mg Copanlisib: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting-toxicity (DLT)2 of 51 of 38NCT04933617Trial comparisons
Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Original: 30mg Copanlisib vs Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Modified: 30mg Copanlisib: Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
5 of 53 of 38NCT04933617Trial comparisons
Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Original: 30mg Copanlisib vs Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Modified: 30mg Copanlisib: deaths from any cause5 of 50 of 38NCT04933617Trial comparisons
Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Original: 30mg Copanlisib vs Dose Escalation: Arm 1, Dose Level 1, Modified: 30mg Copanlisib: serious adverse events2 of 50 of 38NCT04933617Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0007243/comparisons