ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0021113

Comparisons in its trials62

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Dapagliflozin 10mg vs Placebo: Improving Clinical Recovery: Hierarchical Composite Outcome Measure Including Death From Any Cause Through Day 30, New/Worsened Organ Dysfunction, Clinical Status at Day 30 and Hospital Discharge Before Day 30 and Alive at Day 30.
547 of 625532 of 6251,250NCT04350593Trial comparisons
Dapagliflozin 10mg vs Placebo: deaths from any cause41 of 62554 of 6251,250NCT04350593Trial comparisons
Dapagliflozin 10mg vs Placebo: serious adverse events70 of 61387 of 6161,229NCT04350593Trial comparisons
Tocilizumab vs Placebo: deaths from any cause9 of 1614 of 82243NCT04356937Trial comparisons
Tocilizumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events19 of 1618 of 82243NCT04356937Trial comparisons
Aviptadil IV in Escalating Doses + Standard of Care vs Placebo + Standard of Care: Number of Participants Achieving a Score of 6-8 on NIAID Ordinal Score Through Day 6076 of 13135 of 65196NCT04311697Trial comparisons
Aviptadil IV in Escalating Doses + Standard of Care vs Placebo + Standard of Care: Resolution of Respiratory Failure (Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure)72 of 13133 of 65196NCT04311697Trial comparisons
Aviptadil IV in Escalating Doses + Standard of Care vs Placebo + Standard of Care: Number of Participants Alive at Day 6085 of 13135 of 65196NCT04311697Trial comparisons
Aviptadil IV in Escalating Doses + Standard of Care vs Placebo + Standard of Care: deaths from any cause46 of 13130 of 65196NCT04311697Trial comparisons
Aviptadil IV in Escalating Doses + Standard of Care vs Placebo + Standard of Care: serious adverse events58 of 13132 of 65196NCT04311697Trial comparisons
Lucinactant vs Sham Air: serious adverse events20 of 8414 of 81165NCT00578734Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Increase of Supplemental Oxygen Needs From Baseline.4 of 3012 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Medications With Possible Antiviral Activity (Hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Ribavirin or Remdesivir) or Adjunctive Therapy Use (e.g., Tocilizumab)
30 of 3030 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by Protocol Definition of AE24 of 3044 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: in Hospital Mortality Rate1 of 303 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Mechanical Ventilation Use2 of 309 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation or Heated High Flow Nasal Cannula Use6 of 303 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use0 of 300 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: Number of Participants With Intolerance to High Dose (50mg) Losartan After Tolerating 25mg2 of 300 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons
Open Label Losartan vs External Controls: deaths from any cause1 of 303 of 4676NCT04335123Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0021113/comparisons