ConductScience.org, home

Drug · CHEMBL6068614

Comparisons in its trials14

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials whose record names the drug, most participants first. A comparison in one of its trials does not always compare the drug, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: Comparison of the Incidence of Death Between Octaplex and FP Groups7 of 2138 of 207420NCT05523297Trial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: Comparison of Incidence of Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Between Octaplex and FP Groups77 of 21398 of 207420NCT05523297Trial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: deaths from any cause7 of 2138 of 207420NCT05523297Trial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: serious adverse events77 of 21398 of 207420NCT05523297Trial comparisons
Beriplex® P/N vs Fresh Frozen Plasma: serious adverse events32 of 10326 of 109212NCT00708435Trial comparisons
Octaplex vs Beriplex P/N (Kcentra): deaths from any cause5 of 1051 of 103208NCT02740335Trial comparisons
Octaplex vs Beriplex P/N (Kcentra): serious adverse events13 of 1056 of 103208NCT02740335Trial comparisons
Beriplex® P/N vs Fresh Frozen Plasma: 45-Day All-cause Mortality9 of 985 of 104202NCT00708435Trial comparisons
Fresh Frozen Plasma vs Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: deaths from any cause2 of 491 of 51100NCT02557672Trial comparisons
Fresh Frozen Plasma vs Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: serious adverse events44 of 4945 of 51100NCT02557672Trial comparisons
Fixed Dose 4FPCC vs Variable Dose 4FPCC: Number of Participants Who Demonstrated Significant Reversal of INR Within 15 Minutes21 of 3433 of 3771NCT03064035Trial comparisons
Fixed Dose 4FPCC vs Variable Dose 4FPCC: deaths from any cause0 of 340 of 3771NCT03064035Trial comparisons
Fixed Dose 4FPCC vs Variable Dose 4FPCC: Number of Participants With a Thromboembolic Event0 of 340 of 3771NCT03064035Trial comparisons
Fixed Dose 4FPCC vs Variable Dose 4FPCC: serious adverse events0 of 340 of 3771NCT03064035Trial comparisons

pipelines-2026-09-18-0.3.1

Sources 7

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ConductCognition's list of its testsOur own data
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ConductCognition's list of its testsOur own data: ConductCognition's list of its tests, https://conductcognition.com
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/drugs/v1/CHEMBL6068614/comparisons