ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05523297

Active-control Randomized Trial Comparing 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma in Cardiac Surgery

NCT05523297, Phase 3, Completed, Octapharma; results first posted 2025-08-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Active-control Randomized Trial Comparing 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma in Cardiac Surgery. Trials, record NCT05523297. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05523297

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Active-control Randomized Trial Comparing 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma in Cardiac Surgery
NCT number
NCT05523297
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
420 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Octapharma
Conditions
Bleeding Cardiac Surgery Patients
Interventions
Octaplex, Frozen Plasma Product, Human
First posted
2022-08-31
Last updated
2025-08-15
Results first posted
2025-08-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes29

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic Intervention60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMP
Defined as 'effective' if no additional hemostatic intervention, such as administration of any systemic hemostatic agents (including platelets, cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen concentrate, activated recombinant factor VII \[rFVIIa\], other coagulation factor products or a second dose of IMP) or any hemostatic interventions (including surgical re-opening for bleeding) is required from 60 minutes to 24 hours after initiation of the first dose of IMP.
SecondaryComparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin Levels60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMP
Defined as 'positive' if no additional hemostatic intervention is required and hemoglobin levels decrease by \<30% (after accounting for red cell transfusions) from 60 minutes to 24 hours after initiation of the first dose of IMP.
SecondaryCompare the Amount of Chest Tube Drainage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.12 and 24 hours after chest closure
SecondaryCompare the Incidence of Severe to Massive Bleeding Between the Octaplex and FP Groups Using a Modification of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB).24 hours after surgery start, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationYes or no refers to whether severe to massive bleeding was present.
SecondaryCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Allogeneic Blood Products (ABPs) (IMP and Non-IMP) Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPB
SecondaryCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Products Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPB
SecondaryCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours and 7 days after IMP initiation
SecondaryCompare Mean Number of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery, and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiation
SecondaryCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Incidence of Transfusion of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiation
SecondaryCompare Incidence of Administration of Non-IMP Coagulation Factor Products Between Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours and 7 days after the start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiation

Outcomes29

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic Intervention60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMPParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYComparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin Levels60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMPData were not available for 2 patients in the FP group due to missing hemoglobin values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare the Amount of Chest Tube Drainage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.12 and 24 hours after chest closureMilliliters (mL)MEAN
SECONDARYCompare the Incidence of Severe to Massive Bleeding Between the Octaplex and FP Groups Using a Modification of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB).24 hours after surgery start, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Allogeneic Blood Products (ABPs) (IMP and Non-IMP) Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPBtotal ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Products Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPBtotal non-IMP ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours and 7 days after IMP initiationTotal non-IMP ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Mean Number of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery, and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Incidence of Transfusion of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare Incidence of Administration of Non-IMP Coagulation Factor Products Between Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours and 7 days after the start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group180

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic InterventionOctaplexEffective166Participants
Number of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic InterventionFrozen PlasmaEffective125Participants
Number of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic InterventionOctaplexIneffective47Participants
Number of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic InterventionFrozen PlasmaIneffective82Participants
Comparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin LevelsOctaplexNegative56Participants
Comparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin LevelsFrozen PlasmaNegative83Participants
Comparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin LevelsOctaplexPositive157Participants
Comparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin LevelsFrozen PlasmaPositive122Participants
Compare the Amount of Chest Tube Drainage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.Octaplex12 hours after chest closure471.20Standard Deviation 358.32Milliliters (mL)
Compare the Amount of Chest Tube Drainage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.Frozen Plasma12 hours after chest closure641.90Standard Deviation 465.17Milliliters (mL)

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOctaplex213
Overall StudySTARTEDFrozen Plasma207
Overall StudyPer-protocol Population (PP)Octaplex209
Overall StudyPer-protocol Population (PP)Frozen Plasma200
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOctaplex204
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFrozen Plasma198
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOctaplex9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFrozen Plasma9

Adverse events642

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsOctaplex12131
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsFrozen Plasma42074
otherCellulitisInfections and infestationsOctaplex22132
otherCellulitisInfections and infestationsFrozen Plasma12071
otherClostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestationsOctaplex12131
otherClostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestationsFrozen Plasma12071
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsOctaplex12131
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsFrozen Plasma32073
otherLocalised infectionInfections and infestationsOctaplex12131
otherLocalised infectionInfections and infestationsFrozen Plasma12071

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOctaplex7213
Total, all-cause mortalityFrozen Plasma8207
Total, other adverse eventsOctaplex206213
Total, other adverse eventsFrozen Plasma201207
Total, serious adverse eventsOctaplex77213
Total, serious adverse eventsFrozen Plasma98207

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
39174056DERIVEDPubMed
40156829DERIVEDPubMed
42404094DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: Comparison of the Incidence of Death Between Octaplex and FP GroupsTrial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: Comparison of Incidence of Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Between Octaplex and FP GroupsTrial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Octaplex vs Frozen Plasma: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05523297

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05523297/registered?page=2