ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05523297

Outcomes29

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients Requiring Additional Hemostatic Intervention60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMPParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYComparison of Global Hemostatic Response Based on Requirement of Additional Hemostatic Intervention and Decreased Hemoglobin Levels60 minutes to 24 hours after first dose of IMPData were not available for 2 patients in the FP group due to missing hemoglobin values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare the Amount of Chest Tube Drainage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.12 and 24 hours after chest closureMilliliters (mL)MEAN
SECONDARYCompare the Incidence of Severe to Massive Bleeding Between the Octaplex and FP Groups Using a Modification of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB).24 hours after surgery start, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Allogeneic Blood Products (ABPs) (IMP and Non-IMP) Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPBtotal ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Products Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours after the end of CPBtotal non-IMP ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Mean Number of Total Non-IMP Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.First 24 hours and 7 days after IMP initiationTotal non-IMP ABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Mean Number of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery, and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationABPsMEAN
SECONDARYCompare Efficacy in Terms of the Incidence of Transfusion of Individual Allogeneic Blood Components Transfused Between the Octaplex and FP Groups.24 hours and 7 days after start of surgery and after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare Incidence of Administration of Non-IMP Coagulation Factor Products Between Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours and 7 days after the start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCompare Incidence of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Between the Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours after start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCompare Incidence of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Between Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours after start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCompare Incidence of Surgical Re-exploration Between Octaplex and FP Groups24 hours after start of surgery, after the end of CPB and after IMP initiationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in International Normalised Ratio (INR) Before and After Therapy Administration.Within 30 minutes before to 60 minutes after the initiation of IMP administration.The analysis of absolute change included all patients who had INR data available at both pre- and post-IMP time points.international normalised ratio (INR)MEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in Prothrombin Time (PT)Within 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationsecondsMEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)Within 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationsecondsMEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in Fibrinogen ActivityWithin 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationgrams per liter (g/L)MEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in ROTEM EXTEM CTWithin 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationFew data were available as ROTEM measurements were not mandated by the study protocol.secondsMEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in ROTEM EXTEM MCFWithin 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationFew data were available as ROTEM measurements were not mandated by the study protocol.Millimeters (mm)MEAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Effect of Octaplex Versus FP Administration on the Change in ROTEM FIBTEM MCFWithin 75 minutes before to within 75 minutes after the initiation of IMP administrationFew data were available as ROTEM measurements were not mandated by the study protocol.Millimeters (mm)MEAN

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05523297/outcomes