ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00379769

Trial comparisons11

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions
Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation EventsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseTrial comparisons
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up vs Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up: Number of Participants With an Event of Death Due to a Bone Fracture-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined
Trial comparisons
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint DefinitionsTrial comparisons

trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00379769/comparisons