ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00486434

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT00486434, Phase 3, Completed, Nordic Bioscience A/S; results first posted 2012-06-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT00486434. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00486434

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT00486434
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,176 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Nordic Bioscience A/S
Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Interventions
SMC021 Oral Calcitonin, SMC021 Placebo
First posted
2007-06-14
Last updated
2019-04-26
Results first posted
2012-06-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryJoint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.Change from baseline to 24 months
The signal knee was chosen prior to randomization based on which knee met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The JSW is the space measured in mm between the 2 bones in the knee joint and this is assessed by x-ray. The JSW decreases with disease progression. The lower limit for participation in the trial were 2 mm JSW. There were no upper limit as long as inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The outcome was measured as a change in JSW from baseline to month 24.
PrimaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal KneeChange from baseline to 24 months
WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the pain associated with performing each daily activity listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no pain (best), 100 is extreme pain (Worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 500. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less pain).
PrimaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.Change from baseline to 24 months
WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the degree of difficulty for performing each daily function listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no difficulty (best), 100 is extreme difficulty (worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 1700. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less difficulty).
SecondaryChanges in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.From Baseline to Month 24
The central laboratory analyzed serum CTX-I (S-Crosslaps, Elecsys) and osteocalcin as well as urine CTX-I/creatinine and CTX-II/creatinine. It was originally planned that serum CTX-II would be measured, but this was not done.
SecondaryEffect on Hand Osteoarthritis (OA) Assessed by X-ray & Questionnaire From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline and Month 24
To assess disease progression of OA affected joints, X-rays of both hands were performed \& assessed by two central readers (at Synarc). Hand OA was assessed by calculating total score for osteophytes, cyst erosion, \& joint space narrowing, each of which were based on sum of left and right hand X-ray analysis with possible scores of 0-66. The overall total score (possible range 0-198) was also used. Higher scores (closer to 66 or to 198 when using overall total score) imply a worse outcome. Hand analyses were based on double readings, and the mean was used in the analyses. The AUStralian/CANadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaire was also used for assessment of hand OA. It measures pain (5 questions), stiffness (1 question) and difficulties with daily activities (9 questions) through a visual analogue scale (0-100mm; 0 = lowest score; 100 = highest score). Lower AUSCAN scores represent a better outcome. Change (from baseline to month 24) in these scores was calculated.
SecondaryNature and # of AEs Monitored Continuously During StudyFrom Baseline to Month 24Adverse events were by system organ class of all patients.
SecondaryDisease Progression in the Knee Evaluated by MRI.From Baseline to Month 24
Disease progression in the signal knee (cartilage volume and thickness) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania using a quality controlled low-field 0.18T C-Span scanner from Esaote dedicated to the imaging of extremities. The same solenoid coil was used for all patients at a given site.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYJoint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.Change from baseline to 24 months
The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.
mmMEAN
PRIMARYWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal KneeChange from baseline to 24 months
The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.
Units on a scaleMEDIAN
PRIMARYWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.Change from baseline to 24 months
The number of participants analysed for this outcome is the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. ITT is the number of randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. There were 7 patients in the randomized population who did not receive any study drug and where therefore excluded from the ITT analysis.
Units on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChanges in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.From Baseline to Month 24ITT Population. The number analyzed in some rows differs from the overall number analyzed due to missing values from patients who prematurely discontinued.percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYEffect on Hand Osteoarthritis (OA) Assessed by X-ray & Questionnaire From Baseline to 24 MonthsBaseline and Month 24
About 15% of the ITT population had hand OA at baseline and only these subjects were included in the X-ray assessments.The AUSCAN questionnaire was administered to all the patients at sites in Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania.
Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNature and # of AEs Monitored Continuously During StudyFrom Baseline to Month 24ITT population. A patient with multiple occurrences of a TEAE under one treatment is counted only once in the AE category for that treatment.Number of AEs by system organ classNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Progression in the Knee Evaluated by MRI.From Baseline to Month 24MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania.percentage of changeMEAN

Results by group107

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.Active Arm-0.188Standard Deviation 0.5626mm
Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.Placebo Arm-0.198Standard Deviation 0.5069mm
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal KneeActive Arm-124.0Inter-Quartile Range -391 to 218Units on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal KneePlacebo Arm-109.0Inter-Quartile Range -410 to 349Units on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.Active Arm-390.0Inter-Quartile Range -1307 to 783Units on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.Placebo Arm-299.5Inter-Quartile Range -1342 to 915Units on a scale
Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.Active ArmSerum CTX-I (ng/mL)41.358Standard Deviation 68.1153percentage of change
Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.Placebo ArmSerum CTX-I (ng/mL)62.883Standard Deviation 65.7225percentage of change
Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.Active ArmSerum Osteocalcin (ng/mL)-9.134Standard Deviation 22.1368percentage of change
Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.Placebo ArmSerum Osteocalcin (ng/mL)1.785Standard Deviation 22.8324percentage of change

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDActive Arm588
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Arm588
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive Arm394
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Arm454
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActive Arm194
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Arm134

Adverse events354

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersActive Arm89585
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Arm93584
otherHot flushVascular disordersActive Arm104585
otherHot flushVascular disordersPlacebo Arm24584
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersActive Arm62585
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Arm59584
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersActive Arm82585
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm18584
otherHypertensionVascular disordersActive Arm46585
otherHypertensionVascular disordersPlacebo Arm52584

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityActive Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Arm
Total, other adverse eventsActive Arm548585
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Arm520584
Total, serious adverse eventsActive Arm100585
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Arm88584

Papers7

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20932224DERIVEDPubMed
25582279DERIVEDPubMed
29343266DERIVEDPubMed
31481084DERIVEDPubMed
32249039DERIVEDPubMed
41764561DERIVEDPubMed
42092979DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Active Arm vs Placebo Arm: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00486434

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00486434/results?page=2