Trial · NCT00623805
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00623805, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2014-08-08
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Trials, record NCT00623805. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00623805
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- NCT number
- NCT00623805
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 123 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Bevacizumab, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin
- First posted
- 2008-02-26
- Last updated
- 2014-08-08
- Results first posted
- 2014-08-08
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes7
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-free Survival | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter. |
| Secondary | Overall Survival | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Overall survival was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug to death. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-target lesions. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter. |
| Secondary | Time Until a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Baseline to Month 13 | Time until a complete response or a partial response was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug until the first complete response or partial response. |
| Secondary | Duration of Response | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Duration of response was defined as the time from the first complete response or partial response until disease progression or death. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Metastatic Lesions Previously Considered Inoperable Who Became Operable and Underwent Surgery | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a R0 Resection | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | An R0 resection indicates a microscopically margin-negative resection, in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the primary tumor bed. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes7
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Progression-free Survival | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had at least 1 post-randomization efficacy assessment. | Months | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Overall Survival | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had at least 1 post-randomization efficacy assessment. | Months | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had at least 1 post-randomization efficacy assessment. | Percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Time Until a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Baseline to Month 13 | Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had at least 1 post-randomization efficacy assessment. Only participants with a complete response or a partial response were included in the analysis. | Months | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Duration of Response | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | |||
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants With Metastatic Lesions Previously Considered Inoperable Who Became Operable and Underwent Surgery | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) | Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who had at least 1 post-randomization efficacy assessment. | Percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants With a R0 Resection | Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months) |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group10
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 9.0 | Standard Error 0.7 | Months | |
| Progression-free Survival | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 12.6 | Standard Error 1.0 | Months | |
| Overall Survival | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 21.0 | Standard Error 1.3 | Months | |
| Overall Survival | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 25.4 | Standard Error 1.7 | Months | |
| Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 53.2 | Percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 59.0 | Percentage of participants | ||
| Time Until a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 3.5 | Standard Deviation 2.8 | Months | |
| Time Until a Complete Response or a Partial Response | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 2.9 | Standard Deviation 2.0 | Months | |
| Percentage of Participants With Metastatic Lesions Previously Considered Inoperable Who Became Operable and Underwent Surgery | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 58.1 | Percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants With Metastatic Lesions Previously Considered Inoperable Who Became Operable and Underwent Surgery | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 54.1 | Percentage of participants |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Participant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 62 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 61 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 42 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 39 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 20 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 22 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events66
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 27 | 62 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 17 | 61 | |
| other | Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 24 | 62 | |
| other | Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 16 | 61 | |
| other | Weakness | General disorders | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 24 | 62 | |
| other | Weakness | General disorders | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 18 | 61 | |
| other | Anorexia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 17 | 62 | |
| other | Anorexia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 13 | 61 | |
| other | Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 24 | 62 | |
| other | Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 17 | 61 |
1 to 10 of 66Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 66 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 62 | 62 |
| Total, other adverse events | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 61 | 61 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin | 12 | 62 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C | 21 | 61 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Bevacizumab+Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin vs Bevacizumab(B)+Capecitabine(C)+Oxaliplatin Followed by B+C: serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00623805
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00623805/events?page=2