ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00624468

Atacicept in Subjects With Optic Neuritis

NCT00624468, Phase 2, Terminated, EMD Serono; results first posted 2016-02-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Atacicept in Subjects With Optic Neuritis. Trials, record NCT00624468. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00624468

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Atacicept in Subjects With Optic Neuritis
NCT number
NCT00624468
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
34 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
EMD Serono
Conditions
Optic Neuritis
Interventions
Atacicept, Placebo matched to atacicept
First posted
2008-02-27
Last updated
2016-02-17
Results first posted
2016-02-17
Limitations and caveats
The Sponsor voluntarily terminated this trial after observing increased Multiple Sclerosis (MS) disease activity in trial 28063 (ATAMS).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Baseline, LOV (Week 48)
The RNFL thickness was measured for 12 sectors (every 30 degrees) per eye in triplicate by optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements and were then averaged over 12 sectors. The change in RNFL thickness at LOV visit was calculated as RNFL thickness at LOV minus RNFL thickness at baseline.
SecondaryDifference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyeWeeks 12, 24 and 36
The RNFL thickness was measured for 12 sectors (every 30 degrees) per eye in triplicate by optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements and was then averaged over 12 sectors. Difference was calculated as RNFL thickness in affected eye minus RNFL thickness in fellow eye.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
The RNFL thickness was measured for 12 sectors (every 30 degrees) per eye in triplicate by OCT measurements and was then averaged over 12 sectors. The change in RNFL thickness at Weeks 12 and 24 was calculated as RNFL thickness at Weeks 12 and 24 minus RNFL thickness at baseline, respectively.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Macular Thickness at 3 Millimeter (mm) Around Fovea in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36
The change in macular thickness at 3 mm around fovea in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 was calculated as macular thickness at 3 mm in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 minus macular thickness at 3 mm in the affected eye at baseline, respectively.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Macular Thickness at 6 Millimeter (mm) Around Fovea in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36
The change in macular thickness at 6 mm around fovea in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 was calculated as macular thickness at 6 mm in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 minus macular thickness at 6 mm in the affected eye at baseline, respectively.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Macular Volume in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36
The change in macular volume in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 was calculated as macular volume in the affected eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36 minus macular volume in the affected eye at baseline, respectively.
SecondaryLow-Contrast Letter Acuity: Total Number of Letters Correctly IdentifiedWeeks 12, 24 and 36
Low-contrast letter acuity was measured by using the Sloan Charts at 1.25 fraction (%) and 2.5%. Sloan letters are a set of optotypes used to test visual acuity. Total number of letters correctly identified in the affected and fellow eye were reported. The possible Sloan Chart range is 0 to 70. More the number of letters identified, better is the visual acuity.
SecondaryContrast Sensitivity: Total Number of Letters Correctly IdentifiedWeeks 12, 24 and 36
Contrast Sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson Charts. Pelli-Robson chart is used for clinical measurement of contrast sensitivity and determines the contrast required to read large letters of a fixed size. Total number of letters correctly identified in the affected and fellow eye were reported. The total possible range is 0 to 48. More the number of letters identified, better is the contrast sensitivity.
SecondaryContrast Sensitivity: Score LineWeeks 12, 24 and 36
Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson charts with letters arranged in groups of 3. Pelli-Robson chart is used for clinical measurement of contrast sensitivity and determines the contrast required to read large letters of a fixed size. The possible score line range is 0 (visual disability) to 16 (normal contrast sensitivity).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Converting to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Second Clinical AttackFrom baseline (Study Day 1) up to Week 36
Conversion to CDMS was defined as experiencing a second clinical attack meeting all of the following criteria: (a) Neurological abnormality, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both (i) Neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, and (ii) Neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours; (b) Absence of fever or known infection (fever with temperature \[axillary, orally or intraauricularly\] greater than 37.5 degree Celsius/99.5 degree Fahrenheit); (c) Objective neurological impairment, correlating with the participant's reported symptoms, defined as either (i) Increase in at least 1 of the functional systems of the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), or (ii) Increase of the total EDSS score. EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems and total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Percentage of participants converting to CDMS (second clinical attack) was reported.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Baseline, LOV (Week 48)ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYDifference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyeWeeks 12, 24 and 36
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.
micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.
micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Macular Thickness at 3 Millimeter (mm) Around Fovea in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Macular Thickness at 6 Millimeter (mm) Around Fovea in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Macular Volume in the Affected Eye at Weeks 12, 24 and 36Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 36ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.cubic micrometerMEAN
SECONDARYLow-Contrast Letter Acuity: Total Number of Letters Correctly IdentifiedWeeks 12, 24 and 36
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.
lettersMEAN
SECONDARYContrast Sensitivity: Total Number of Letters Correctly IdentifiedWeeks 12, 24 and 36
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.
lettersMEAN
SECONDARYContrast Sensitivity: Score LineWeeks 12, 24 and 36
ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Converting to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Second Clinical AttackFrom baseline (Study Day 1) up to Week 36ITT population included all randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group90

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Placebo: Double-blind PeriodBaseline (n = 17, 17)103.893Standard Deviation 17.271micrometer
Change From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Atacicept: Double-blind PeriodBaseline (n = 17, 17)104.170Standard Deviation 8.832micrometer
Change From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Placebo: Double-blind PeriodChange at LOV (n = 16, 15)-17.317Standard Deviation 15.158micrometer
Change From Baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness in the Affected Eye at Last Observed Value (LOV)Atacicept: Double-blind PeriodChange at LOV (n = 16, 15)-8.636Standard Deviation 10.056micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyePlacebo: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 12 (n = 13, 13)-14Standard Error 4micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyeAtacicept: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 12 (n = 13, 13)-7.9Standard Error 1.5micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyePlacebo: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 24 (n = 4, 5)-7Standard Error 6.9micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyeAtacicept: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 24 (n = 4, 5)-10.6Standard Error 3.7micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyePlacebo: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 36 (n = 3, 4)-7.5Standard Error 8.8micrometer
Difference in Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) Thickness Between the Affected Eye and Fellow EyeAtacicept: Double-blind PeriodChange at Week 36 (n = 3, 4)-9.4Standard Error 6.6micrometer

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo: Double-blind Period17
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDAtacicept: Double-blind Period17
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo: SFU Period0
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDAtacicept: SFU Period0
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo: Double-blind Period3
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDAtacicept: Double-blind Period4
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo: SFU Period0
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDAtacicept: SFU Period0
Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo: Double-blind Period14
Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDAtacicept: Double-blind Period13

Adverse events460

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersPlacebo: Double-blind Period317
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersAtacicept: Double-blind Period1117
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersPlacebo: SFU Period113
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersAtacicept: SFU Period214
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo: Double-blind Period317
otherFatigueGeneral disordersAtacicept: Double-blind Period317
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo: SFU Period013
otherFatigueGeneral disordersAtacicept: SFU Period014
otherInjection site haematomaGeneral disordersPlacebo: Double-blind Period117
otherInjection site haematomaGeneral disordersAtacicept: Double-blind Period317

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo: Double-blind Period
Total, all-cause mortalityAtacicept: Double-blind Period
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo: SFU Period
Total, all-cause mortalityAtacicept: SFU Period
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo: Double-blind Period1417
Total, other adverse eventsAtacicept: Double-blind Period1617
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo: SFU Period613
Total, other adverse eventsAtacicept: SFU Period1014
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo: Double-blind Period017
Total, serious adverse eventsAtacicept: Double-blind Period017

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00624468

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00624468/results?page=2