Trial · NCT00758667
Chemically Assisted Capsulectomy-A New Clinical Approach
NCT00758667, Not applicable, Terminated, Vanderbilt University; results first posted 2014-12-10
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Chemically Assisted Capsulectomy-A New Clinical Approach. Trials, record NCT00758667. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00758667
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Chemically Assisted Capsulectomy-A New Clinical Approach
- NCT number
- NCT00758667
- Status
- Terminated
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 20 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Conditions
- Implant Capsular Contracture
- Interventions
- Mesna
- First posted
- 2008-09-25
- Last updated
- 2014-12-10
- Results first posted
- 2014-12-10
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes2
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Compare Number of Patients With Capsular Contracture in Mesna Group vs Standard of Care | one year | |
| Secondary | Compare Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the Mesna Group vs the Standard of Care | one year |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes2
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Compare Number of Patients With Capsular Contracture in Mesna Group vs Standard of Care | one year | participants | NUMBER | |
| SECONDARY | Compare Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the Mesna Group vs the Standard of Care | one year | participants | NUMBER |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group4
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compare Number of Patients With Capsular Contracture in Mesna Group vs Standard of Care | Standard | 2 | participants | ||
| Compare Number of Patients With Capsular Contracture in Mesna Group vs Standard of Care | Mesna | 4 | participants | ||
| Compare Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the Mesna Group vs the Standard of Care | Standard | 0 | participants | ||
| Compare Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the Mesna Group vs the Standard of Care | Mesna | 0 | participants |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Participant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Standard | 9 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Mesna | 11 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Standard | 9 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Mesna | 11 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Standard | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Mesna | 0 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Standard | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Mesna | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Standard | 0 | 9 |
| Total, other adverse events | Mesna | 0 | 11 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Standard | 0 | 9 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Mesna | 0 | 11 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons3
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Standard vs Mesna: Compare Number of Patients With Capsular Contracture in Mesna Group vs Standard of Care | Trial comparisons |
| Standard vs Mesna: Compare Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the Mesna Group vs the Standard of Care | Trial comparisons |
| Standard vs Mesna: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00758667
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00758667/registered