ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00950651

A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Tramadol HCl / Contramid® Tablets to Twice Daily Tramadol HCl (SR) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

NCT00950651, Phase 3, Completed, Labopharm Inc.; results first posted 2009-08-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Tramadol HCl / Contramid® Tablets to Twice Daily Tramadol HCl (SR) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Trials, record NCT00950651. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00950651

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Tramadol HCl / Contramid® Tablets to Twice Daily Tramadol HCl (SR) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT number
NCT00950651
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
431 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Labopharm Inc.
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain
Interventions
Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day, Tramadol HCl Twice a day
First posted
2009-08-03
Last updated
2012-04-30
Results first posted
2009-08-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
The WOMAC is a statistically validated, 24-item questionnaire assessing current OA symptoms and functional limitations. The Pain subscale score consists of 5 items each rated on a 100mm VAS scale (0mm=no pain to 100mm=extreme pain). In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate the percentage of change.
SecondaryArthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)12 weeks
Each day before morning dose, patients assessed arthritis pain in worst knee in a diary using a 5-point rating scale ranging from none to severe. A median score was estimated for each patient each week and re-categorized into different degrees of pain (rounding off to the closest integer). Results are of 12th week (day 78-84).
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
The WOMAC is a statistically validated, 24-item questionnaire assessing current OA symptoms and functional limitations. Stiffness subscale score consists of 2 items each rated on 100mm VAS scale (0mm=no stiffness to 100mm=extreme stiffness). In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate the percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
The WOMAC is a statistically validated, 24-item questionnaire assessing current OA symptoms and functional limitations. Physical Function subscale score consists of 17 items rated on a 100mm VAS scale (0mm=no difficulty to 100mm=extreme difficulty). In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
The WOMAC is a statistically validated, 24-item questionnaire assessing current OA symptoms and functional limitations. Each item is rated on a 100mm VAS scale (0mm=no pain/stiffness/difficulty to 100mm=extreme no pain/stiffness/difficulty). In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in Current Pain at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Pain Visual Analogue Scales: Current Pain. Patients indicated their current pain using a 100mm VAS scale ranging from 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain. The percentage of change in current pain was calculated from baseline to week 12. In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in Least Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Patients indicated their Least Pain Within Last 24 Hours using a 100mm VAS scale ranging from 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain. The percentage of change was calculated from baseline to week 12. In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in Worst Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Patients indicated their Worst Pain Within Last 24 Hours using a 100mm VAS scale ranging from 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain. The percentage of change was calculated from baseline to week 12. In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in Average Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Patients indicated their Average Pain Within Last 24 Hours using a 100mm VAS scale ranging from 0=no pain to 100=extreme pain. The percentage of change was calculated from baseline to week 12. In case of premature discontinuation, the last assessment was used to calculate percentage of change.
SecondaryPercentage of Change From Baseline in Walking Time for 15 Meters at Week 12Baseline to week 12The walking test is a measure of how many seconds it takes the patient to walk a distance of 15 meters. The change from baseline to week 12 was calculated.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYArthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)12 weeks
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Total Score at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in Current Pain at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in Least Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in Worst Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in Average Pain Within Last 24 Hours at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Change From Baseline in Walking Time for 15 Meters at Week 12Baseline to week 12
Per protocol population: patients who completed study, had no major protocol deviations before/during trial and had primary efficacy variable rating at end of study. Early drop-outs due to AEs / lack of efficacy were included if they took study drug for \>2weeks in maintenance phase and had efficacy assessments within 2 days after end of study drug.
percentage of changeMEAN

Results by group74

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Week 12Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day58.3Standard Deviation 29.9percentage of change
Percentage of Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Week 12Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)58.7Standard Deviation 27.0percentage of change
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A DayNone20participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)None19participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A DayBarely noticeable42participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)Barely noticeable33participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A DayMild35participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)Mild40participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A DayModerate35participants
Arthritis Pain at the End of Dosing Interval (24-hour Efficacy)Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)Moderate32participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day215
Overall StudySTARTEDTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)216
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day184
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)181
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)35

Adverse events40

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day73215136
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)65215143
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day5121585
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)6521597
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day2021528
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)1021515
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day2721537
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)3821554
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day70215121
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)73215134

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day
Total, all-cause mortalityTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)
Total, other adverse eventsTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day159215
Total, other adverse eventsTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)159215
Total, serious adverse eventsTramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day3215
Total, serious adverse eventsTramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR)8215

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
17523716RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Tramadol HCl Contramid® Once A Day vs Tramadol HCl Twice a Day (SR): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00950651

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00950651/registered?page=2