ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01035255

This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

NCT01035255, Phase 3, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2015-09-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Trials, record NCT01035255. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01035255

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
NCT number
NCT01035255
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
8,442 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Interventions
LCZ696 200 mg BID, Enalapril 10 mg BID
First posted
2009-12-18
Last updated
2016-08-15
Results first posted
2015-09-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalizationup to 51 monthsNumber of participants that had first occurrence of the composite endpoint, which is defined as either CV death or HF hospitalization due to HF.
SecondaryNumber of Patients - All-cause Mortalityup to 51 monthsNumber of patients - All-cause mortality. All-cause mortality is common in Heart Failure HF patients this measures how many patients had this event. The data is on FAS population up to March 31, 2014
SecondaryNumber of Patients Reported With Adjudicated Primary Causes of Deathup to 51 monthsNumber of patients reported with adjudicated primary causes of death. The data is on Randomization population up to March 31, 2014
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary ScoreBaseline, Month 8
Change from baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score. KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. KCCQ clinical summary score is a composite assessment of physical limitations and total symptom scores. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
SecondaryNumber of Patients With First Confirmed Renal Dysfunctionup to 51 monthsNumber of patients with first confirmed renal dysfunction
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)up to 51 months
Percentage of participants with New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation The new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) analysis was based on a subset of FAS: i.e., for patients without a history of AF at baseline (patients with a history of AF were excluded from this analysis).

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalizationup to 51 months
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients but the following two exclusions: 6 patients who did not qualify for randomization but were inadvertently randomized into the study and did not receive double-blind study medication; 37 patients because they were randomized at sites that were closed due to serious GCP violations
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients - All-cause Mortalityup to 51 months
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients but the following two exclusions: 6 patients who did not qualify for randomization but were inadvertently randomized into the study and did not receive double-blind study medication; 37 patients because they were randomized at sites that were closed due to serious GCP violations
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Reported With Adjudicated Primary Causes of Deathup to 51 monthsRandomized set (RAN): Consisted of all patients who received a randomization number, regardless of receiving trial medication.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Month 8 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary ScoreBaseline, Month 8
FAS included all randomized patients with two exclusions: 6 pts who did not qualify for randomization but were misrandomized into the study and did not receive study meds; 37 pts because they were randomized at sites that were closed due to serious GCP violations The analysis included all FAS patients with at least one KCCQ data up-to Month 8.
KCCQ ScoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With First Confirmed Renal Dysfunctionup to 51 months
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients but the following two exclusions: 6 patients who did not qualify for randomization but were inadvertently randomized into the study and did not receive double-blind study medication; 37 patients because they were randomized at sites that were closed due to serious GCP violations
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)up to 51 monthsThe new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) analysis was based on a subset of FAS: i.e., for patients without a history of AF at baseline (patients with a history of AF were excluded from this analysis).Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group52

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationLCZ696Primary Composite914participants
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationEnalaprilPrimary Composite1117participants
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationLCZ696CV death558participants
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationEnalaprilCV death693participants
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationLCZ6961st HF Hospitalization537participants
Number of Participants That Had First Occurrence of the Composite Endpoint, Which is Defined as Either Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) HospitalizationEnalapril1st HF Hospitalization658participants
Number of Patients - All-cause MortalityLCZ696711participants
Number of Patients - All-cause MortalityEnalapril835participants
Number of Patients Reported With Adjudicated Primary Causes of DeathLCZ696Number of patients who died714participants
Number of Patients Reported With Adjudicated Primary Causes of DeathEnalaprilNumber of patients who died837participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLCZ6964,209
Overall StudySTARTEDEnalapril4,233
Overall StudyGCP ViolationsLCZ69618
Overall StudyGCP ViolationsEnalapril19
Overall StudyMis-randomizedLCZ6964
Overall StudyMis-randomizedEnalapril2
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)LCZ6964,187
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Enalapril4,212
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCZ6963,468
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEnalapril3,371

Adverse events2,416

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLCZ6961404,203
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEnalapril1604,229
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersLCZ6961254,203
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersEnalapril1254,229
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersLCZ6961594,203
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersEnalapril1374,229
otherCardiac failureCardiac disordersLCZ6962144,203
otherCardiac failureCardiac disordersEnalapril2744,229
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLCZ696854,203
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEnalapril1204,229

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLCZ696
Total, all-cause mortalityEnalapril
Total, other adverse eventsLCZ6962,4794,203
Total, other adverse eventsEnalapril2,5944,229
Total, serious adverse eventsLCZ6961,9374,203
Total, serious adverse eventsEnalapril2,1424,229

Papers52

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23563576DERIVEDPubMed
25176015DERIVEDPubMed
25403646DERIVEDPubMed
25416329DERIVEDPubMed
26022006DERIVEDPubMed
26231885DERIVEDPubMed
26280447DERIVEDPubMed
26541915DERIVEDPubMed
26754626DERIVEDPubMed
26915374DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 52

See all 52 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
LCZ696 vs Enalapril: Number of Patients With First Confirmed Renal DysfunctionTrial comparisons
LCZ696 vs Enalapril: Number of Patients - All-cause MortalityTrial comparisons
LCZ696 vs Enalapril: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01035255

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01035255/results?page=2