ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01146652

Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)

NCT01146652, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2022-01-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND). Trials, record NCT01146652. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01146652

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Long Term Evaluation of Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (SARIL-RA-EXTEND)
NCT number
NCT01146652
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
2,023 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
SAR153191 (REGN88)
First posted
2010-06-17
Last updated
2022-03-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-019262-86
Results first posted
2022-01-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes40

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose (i.e., Day 1 of study LTS11210) up to 60 days after last dose (maximum duration: up to 523 weeks)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) in study LTS11210 to the last dose of the IMP +60 days).
PrimarySub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36
A PTF was defined as any product technical complaint (PTC) related to the use of the PFS-S that had a validated technical cause. FDD was defined as participant's failure to administer the full dose at a given attempt. A PTC was defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary. The injection diary comprised specific questions: 1. Were you able to remove the cap? 2. Was the needle safety system activated?, 3. Did the safety system entirely cover the needle, and 4. Was the person who performed the injection the person who was trained by the site staff?, where each question was given the option yes/no. Participants who answered "no" for any of the questions of PTC, had PTF and/or FDD were reported in this outcome measure.
PrimarySub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints - Product Technical Failures With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36
A PTF was defined as any PTC (defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary) related to the use of the PFS-S that had a validated technical cause. Number of PTF in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure.
PrimarySub-study: Number of Failed Drug Deliveries Associated With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36FDD was defined as participant's failure to administer the full dose at a given attempt. Number of FDD in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure.
PrimarySub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36
A PTC was defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary. The injection diary comprised specific questions: 1. Were you able to remove the cap? 2. Was the needle safety system activated?, 3. Did the safety system entirely cover the needle, and 4. Was the person who performed the injection the person who was trained by the site staff?, where each question was given the option yes/no. Number of PTC (based on participant's answer to "no" for any of the questions of PTC) in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20% improvement in both tender joint count and swollen joint count and, \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: C-reactive protein \[CRP\] level (mg/liter \[mg/L\]); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] visual analog scale \[VAS\]); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by health assessment questionnaire disability index \[HAQ-DI\], with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
ACR50 response: \>=50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: CRP level (in mg/L); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: CRP level (in mg/L); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\]to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28) RemissionAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210
Disease activity score based on 28 joints and C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) was a composite score which included 4 components: TJC with 28 joints assessed; SJC with 28 joints assessed; high-sensitivity CRP (in mg/L) and general health assessment by the participant using participant global assessment (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS). DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated greater disease activity. Percentage of participants with DAS28 remission were reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Good Response, Moderate Response or Non-response Using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response CriteriaAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210
DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good or moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and level of disease activity reached. The EULAR response criteria are defined as: * Good response = change from baseline of \>1.2 and a present DAS28-CRP score \<=3.2. * Moderate response = change from baseline of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 and a present DAS28-CRP score \<=5.1, or, change from baseline of \>1.2 and present DAS28-CRP score \>3.2. * Non-response = change from baseline of \<=0.6, or change from baseline of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 and present DAS28-CRP score \>5.1. Scores of good and moderate were considered to indicate therapeutic response. DAS28-CRP is a composite score which included 4 components: TJC with 28 joints assessed; SJC with 28 joints assessed; high-sensitivity CRP (in mg/L) and general health assessment by participant using participant global assessment (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS.

Outcomes40

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose (i.e., Day 1 of study LTS11210) up to 60 days after last dose (maximum duration: up to 523 weeks)Analysis was performed on safety population which included all enrolled participants who had received at least one dose of the study treatment in LTS11210.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYSub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36Analysis was performed on all participants who were enrolled in the sub-study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYSub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints - Product Technical Failures With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36Analysis was performed on all participants who were enrolled in the sub-study.PTFNUMBER
PRIMARYSub-study: Number of Failed Drug Deliveries Associated With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36Analysis was performed on all participants who were enrolled in the sub-study.FDDNUMBER
PRIMARYSub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemFrom Week 24 to 36Analysis was performed on all participants who were enrolled in the sub-study.PTCNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
Analysis was performed on safety population which included participants who had at least 1 dose of study treatment in LTS11210. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) ResponseAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210
Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28) RemissionAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210
Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category and 0 in the number analyzed field denotes that data were not planned to be collected and analyzed for the specified time-points in the respective groups.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Good Response, Moderate Response or Non-response Using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response CriteriaAt Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210
Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category and 0 in the number analyzed field denotes that data was not planned to be collected and analyzed for the specified time-points in the respective groups.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group909

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)Any TEAE1760Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Sarilumab MonotherapyAny TEAE98Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)Any TE SAE617Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Sarilumab MonotherapyAny TE SAE27Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 150 mg q2wPFS-S-associated PTF0Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 200 mg q2wPFS-S-associated PTF0Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 200 to 150 mg q2wPFS-S-associated PTF0Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 150 mg q2wPFS-S-associated FDD0Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 200 mg q2wPFS-S-associated FDD5Participants
Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety SystemPFS-S Sarilumab 200 to 150 mg q2wPFS-S-associated FDD0Participants

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1,912
Overall StudySTARTEDSarilumab Monotherapy111
Overall StudyTreatedSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1,910
Overall StudyTreatedSarilumab Monotherapy111
Overall StudyEnrolled in the Sub-studySarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)110
Overall StudyEnrolled in the Sub-studySarilumab Monotherapy14
Overall StudyDiscontinued From the Sub-studySarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1
Overall StudyDiscontinued From the Sub-studySarilumab Monotherapy2
Overall StudySwitched Back to Main StudySarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)108
Overall StudySwitched Back to Main StudySarilumab Monotherapy13

Adverse events998

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1011,910181
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSarilumab Monotherapy41115
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)3481,910786
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSarilumab Monotherapy1811164
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1221,910153
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSarilumab Monotherapy21112
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1111,910751
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersSarilumab Monotherapy01110
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)2151,910301
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsSarilumab Monotherapy1211119

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)491,910
Total, all-cause mortalitySarilumab Monotherapy3111
Total, other adverse eventsSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)1,4441,910
Total, other adverse eventsSarilumab Monotherapy82111
Total, serious adverse eventsSarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD)6171,910
Total, serious adverse eventsSarilumab Monotherapy27111

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31452928DERIVEDPubMed
33164349DERIVEDPubMed
33871596DERIVEDPubMed
36413080DERIVEDPubMed
36727470DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Sarilumab + Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) vs Sarilumab Monotherapy: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01146652

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01146652/registered?page=2