Trial · NCT01146652
Registered outcomes40
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 40
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From first dose (i.e., Day 1 of study LTS11210) up to 60 days after last dose (maximum duration: up to 523 weeks) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) in study LTS11210 to the last dose of the IMP +60 days). |
| Primary | Sub-study: Number of Participants Reported Product Technical Complaints (PTC), Product Technical Failures (PTF) and/or Failed Drug Deliveries (FDD) With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety System | From Week 24 to 36 | A PTF was defined as any product technical complaint (PTC) related to the use of the PFS-S that had a validated technical cause. FDD was defined as participant's failure to administer the full dose at a given attempt. A PTC was defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary. The injection diary comprised specific questions: 1. Were you able to remove the cap? 2. Was the needle safety system activated?, 3. Did the safety system entirely cover the needle, and 4. Was the person who performed the injection the person who was trained by the site staff?, where each question was given the option yes/no. Participants who answered "no" for any of the questions of PTC, had PTF and/or FDD were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Sub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints - Product Technical Failures With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety System | From Week 24 to 36 | A PTF was defined as any PTC (defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary) related to the use of the PFS-S that had a validated technical cause. Number of PTF in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Sub-study: Number of Failed Drug Deliveries Associated With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety System | From Week 24 to 36 | FDD was defined as participant's failure to administer the full dose at a given attempt. Number of FDD in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Sub-study: Number of Product Technical Complaints With Pre-filled Syringe With Safety System | From Week 24 to 36 | A PTC was defined as any participant- or healthcare provider-reported complaint regarding the use of the PFS-S syringe and collected via the completion of the injection diary. The injection diary comprised specific questions: 1. Were you able to remove the cap? 2. Was the needle safety system activated?, 3. Did the safety system entirely cover the needle, and 4. Was the person who performed the injection the person who was trained by the site staff?, where each question was given the option yes/no. Number of PTC (based on participant's answer to "no" for any of the questions of PTC) in the participants enrolled in sub-study were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response | At Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210 | ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20% improvement in both tender joint count and swollen joint count and, \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: C-reactive protein \[CRP\] level (mg/liter \[mg/L\]); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] visual analog scale \[VAS\]); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by health assessment questionnaire disability index \[HAQ-DI\], with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response | At Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210 | ACR50 response: \>=50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: CRP level (in mg/L); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response | At Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210 | ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures assessments: CRP level (in mg/L); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 \[no pain\] to 100 mm \[worst pain\] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\]to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 \[better physical function\] to 3 \[worst physical function\]). Higher score indicated worse outcomes. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission | At Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | Disease activity score based on 28 joints and C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) was a composite score which included 4 components: TJC with 28 joints assessed; SJC with 28 joints assessed; high-sensitivity CRP (in mg/L) and general health assessment by the participant using participant global assessment (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS). DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated greater disease activity. Percentage of participants with DAS28 remission were reported. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Response, Moderate Response or Non-response Using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria | At Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good or moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and level of disease activity reached. The EULAR response criteria are defined as: * Good response = change from baseline of \>1.2 and a present DAS28-CRP score \<=3.2. * Moderate response = change from baseline of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 and a present DAS28-CRP score \<=5.1, or, change from baseline of \>1.2 and present DAS28-CRP score \>3.2. * Non-response = change from baseline of \<=0.6, or change from baseline of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 and present DAS28-CRP score \>5.1. Scores of good and moderate were considered to indicate therapeutic response. DAS28-CRP is a composite score which included 4 components: TJC with 28 joints assessed; SJC with 28 joints assessed; high-sensitivity CRP (in mg/L) and general health assessment by participant using participant global assessment (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | Baseline, Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | DAS28-CRP is a composite score which included 4 components: TJC with 28 joints assessed; SJC with 28 joints assessed; high-sensitivity CRP (in mg/L) and general health assessment by the participant using participant global assessment (measured on 0 \[no arthritis activity\] to 100 mm \[maximal arthritis activity\] VAS). DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicated greater disease activity. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial studies (EFC11072, ACT11575, EFC10832, SFY13370 and EFC13752). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210 | Baseline, Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 and 264 of LTS11210 | HAQ-DI is a standardized questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; hygiene; reach; grip and activities. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where 0= no difficulty in physical function; 1= some difficulty in physical function; 2= much difficulty in physical function; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty in physical function) to 3 (extreme difficulty in physical function), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial studies (EFC11072, ACT11575, EFC10832, SFY13370 and EFC13752). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 0 and Week 48 of LTS11210: Campaign 1 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Baseline, Week 0 and 48 of LTS11210 | Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both joint erosions (JE) for 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS: sum of the scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score and ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial study (EFC11072 Part B). In this outcome measure, change from initial study Baseline in 2 years X-ray data at Week 0 and 48 of LTS11210 were reported. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48 and Week 96 of LTS11210: Campaign 2 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Baseline, Week 48 and 96 of LTS11210 | Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both JE for 44 joints and JSN for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS: sum of the scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score and ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial study (EFC11072 Part B). In this outcome measure, change from initial study (EFC11072 Part B) Baseline in 3 years X-ray data (participants with study duration of more than 48 weeks in LTS11210) at Week 48 and 96 of LTS11210 from Campaign 2 were reported. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 96, Week 144 and Week 192 of LTS11210: Campaign 3 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Baseline, Week 96, 144 and 192 of LTS11210 | Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both JE for 44 joints and JSN for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS: sum of the scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score and ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial study (EFC11072 Part B). In this outcome measure, change from initial study (EFC11072 Part B) Baseline in 5 years X-ray data (participants with study duration of more than 96 weeks in LTS11210) at Week 96, 144 and 192 of LTS11210 from Campaign 3 were reported. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression of the Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 0 and 48 of LTS11210: Campaign 1 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Week 0 (post-dose) and 48 of LTS11210 | Radiographic no progression: defined as a change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS \<= 0. Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both JE for 44 joints and JSN for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS was sum of scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score, ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). Increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with no radiographic progression at Week 48 of LTS11210 from Campaign 1 X-ray data were reported. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression of the Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 48 and Week 96 of LTS11210: Campaign 2 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Week 48 and 96 of LTS11210 | Radiographic no progression: defined as a change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS \<= 0. Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both JE for 44 joints and JSN for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS was sum of scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score, ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). Increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with no radiographic progression at Week 48 and 96 of LTS11210 from Campaign 2 X-ray data (participants with study duration of more than 48 weeks in LTS11210) were reported. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With no Radiographic Progression of the Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 96, 144 and 192 of LTS11210: Campaign 3 X-ray Data - Participants From EFC11072 Part B | Week 96, 144 and 192 of LTS11210 | Radiographic no progression: defined as a change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS \<= 0. Van der Heijde modified Sharp method is composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in RA. The method evaluates both JE for 44 joints and JSN for 42 joints in bilateral hand and foot joints. Total mTSS was sum of scores from both erosion score and joint space narrowing score, ranged from 0 (normal, no progression) to 448 (worst possible total score). Increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with no radiographic progression at Week 96, 144 and 192 of LTS11210 from Campaign 3 X-ray data (participants with study duration more than 96 weeks in LTS11210) were reported. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | Baseline, Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | TJC is the sum of all tender joints based on examination of the 68 joints of the fingers, elbows, hips, knees, ankles, and toes. Total TJC ranged from 0 (best) to 68 (worst), where higher score = more severity. Change from Baseline in TJC was reported in the outcome measure. Here, Baseline refers to Baseline of initial study (EFC11072, ACT11575, EFC10832, SFY13370 and EFC13752). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | Baseline, Week 0 (post-dose), 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, 360, 384, 408, 432, 456, 480, 504 and 516 of LTS11210 | SJC is the sum of all swollen joints based on examination of the fingers, elbows, knees and toes. Total SJC ranged from 0 (best) to 66 (worst), where higher score = more severity. Change from Baseline in SJC was reported in the outcome measure. Here, Baseline refers to the Baseline of initial studies (EFC11072, ACT11575, EFC10832, SFY13370 and EFC13752). |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01146652/registered