ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01349322

Higher Per Daily Treatment-Dose Radiation Therapy or Standard Per Daily Treatment Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer That Was Removed by Surgery

NCT01349322, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; results first posted 2023-04-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Higher Per Daily Treatment-Dose Radiation Therapy or Standard Per Daily Treatment Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer That Was Removed by Surgery. Trials, record NCT01349322. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01349322

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Higher Per Daily Treatment-Dose Radiation Therapy or Standard Per Daily Treatment Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer That Was Removed by Surgery
NCT number
NCT01349322
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
2,354 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Standard fractionation whole breast irradiation, Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, Concurrent boost, Sequential boost
First posted
2011-05-06
Last updated
2026-03-05
Results first posted
2023-04-06
Limitations and caveats
Due to a lower than anticipated incidence of in-breast recurrence (IBR), the protocol was amended to allow for timely reporting of the trial results with at least 46 IBR events, while maintaining statistical integrity and reflecting current knowledge of the observed IBR incidence in the control arm.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
In-breast recurrence (IBR) is defined as any of the following: invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (within treatment field); invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (outside treatment field); non-invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (within treatment field); or non-invasive local recurrence-ipsilateral breast (outside treatment field). Time to IBR is defined as time from randomization to the date of first IBR, last known follow-up (censored), or death without IBR (competing risk). IBR rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Alive
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Failure is defined as death due to any cause. Failure time (overall survival time) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Alive Without Disease
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Disease-free survival (DFS) time is defined as time from randomization to local-regional disease recurrence, distant metastases, second/new primary, death due to any cause or last known follow-up (censored). DFS rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Alive Without Distant Disease
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) time is defined as time from randomization to distant metastases, second/new primary, death due to any cause or last known follow-up (censored). DDFS rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions between the two arms are compared using the log-rank test. Five-year rates are provided here.
SecondaryNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data
SecondaryChange in Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) Cosmesis Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline and 3 years
The BCTOS cosmesis subscale score measures perceived aesthetic (e.g., breast shape) status . Patients rated each item using a four-point scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1=no difference, 2=slight difference, 3=moderate difference, 4=large difference) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that specific subscale. Change was calculated as the value at 3 years minus the value at baseline. A positive change reflects a decline at 3 years and a negative change reflects an improvement at 3 years.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Physician-reported Cosmetic Score of Excellent or Good at 3 Years3 years
Physicians rated cosmesis using a four point scale: * Excellent: When compared to the untreated breast or the original appearance of the breast, there is minimal/no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast. * Good: There is a slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the opposite breast or the original appearance of the treated breast. * Fair: Obvious differences in the size and shape of the treated breast. This change involves quarter or less of the breast. * Poor: Marked change in the appearance of the treated breast involving more than a quarter of the breast tissue.
SecondaryCorrelation Between Dose-volume Data and Both Adverse Events and EfficacyFrom randomization to end of follow-up.
SecondaryTranslational Research of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGFB1) and Ataxia-Telangiesctasia Mutated (ATM) GenesFrom randomization to last follow-up.
SecondaryTreatment CostFrom randomization to end of treatment.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Eligible populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Alive
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Eligible populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Alive Without Disease
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Eligible populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Alive Without Distant Disease
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years. Five-year rates are provided here.
Eligible populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment
From randomization to last follow-up. Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy (RT), last day of RT, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT completion, then annually. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.1 years.
Adverse event populationParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) Cosmesis Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline and 3 yearsQuality of life population, with data at baseline and 3 years.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Physician-reported Cosmetic Score of Excellent or Good at 3 Years3 yearsQuality of life population, with data at 3 years.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorrelation Between Dose-volume Data and Both Adverse Events and EfficacyFrom randomization to end of follow-up.
SECONDARYTranslational Research of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGFB1) and Ataxia-Telangiesctasia Mutated (ATM) GenesFrom randomization to last follow-up.
The protocol did not provide sufficient detail to meet current National Cancer Institute requirements for release of specimens from the NRG Oncology tissue bank for the protocol-specified analysis, therefore no assays were performed, and no data were collected for this outcome measure. Specimen use will require federal approval and funding separate from this trial.
SECONDARYTreatment CostFrom randomization to end of treatment.

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)Whole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost (Arm 1)2.095% Confidence Interval 1.4 to 2.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost (Arm 2)1.995% Confidence Interval 1.3 to 2.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants AliveWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost95.795% Confidence Interval 94.4 to 96.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants AliveHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost95.195% Confidence Interval 93.8 to 96.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without DiseaseWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost90.295% Confidence Interval 88.5 to 92.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without DiseaseHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost88.595% Confidence Interval 86.7 to 90.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Distant DiseaseWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost91.595% Confidence Interval 89.9 to 93.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Distant DiseaseHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost90.295% Confidence Interval 88.4 to 91.9percentage of participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 1427Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 1554Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1,169
Overall StudySTARTEDHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1,185
Overall StudyEligible populationWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1,124
Overall StudyEligible populationHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1,138
Overall StudyAdverse event populationWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1,100
Overall StudyAdverse event populationHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1,123
Overall StudyQuality of Life PopulationWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost429
Overall StudyQuality of Life PopulationHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost449
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1,124
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1,138

Adverse events136

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost601,100
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost561,123
otherFatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost4351,100
otherFatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost4271,123
otherLocalized edemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1231,100
otherLocalized edemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1161,123
otherPainGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost1601,100
otherPainGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost1441,123
otherDermatitis radiationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost3991,100
otherDermatitis radiationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost3841,123

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost871,124
Total, all-cause mortalityHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost861,138
Total, other adverse eventsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost8661,100
Total, other adverse eventsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost9101,123
Total, serious adverse eventsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost181,100
Total, serious adverse eventsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost201,123

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42114027DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Whole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost vs Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Whole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost vs Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01349322

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01349322/results?page=2